Report on the Investigation of Alleged Public Sector Misconduct by Western Australia Police Officers in Relation to Incidents that Occurred at Broome Police Station on 29 March and 19 April 2013
- Opinions
- 1
- Report length
- 66 pages
Summary
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated two incidents at Broome Police Station, focusing on officers’ intervention, care of detainees, reporting and supervision.
It considered alleged excessive force and examined the treatment of detainees in the lockup.
The Commission concluded that failure to follow existing policies was the main issue and that officers had not adequately discharged their duty of care in either incident.
Its five recommendations cover de-escalation, force reporting, access to medical assessment, custody care training and clearer supervisory duties.
Opinions 1
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
opinion of misconduct
OpinionThe Commission forms opinions of misconduct in accordance with the CCC Act.
Recommendations
No recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Official documents 2
Report on the Investigation of Alleged Public Sector Misconduct by Western Australia Police Officers in Relation to Incidents that Occurred at Broome Police Station on 29 March and 19 April 2013
Document details
- Role
- Report
MEDIA RELEASE - Report on the Investigation of Alleged Public Sector Misconduct by Western Australia Police Officers in Relation to Incidents that Occurred at Broome Police Station on 29 March and 19 April 2013
Document details
- Status
- Linked
- Role
- Media release
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
- An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.