Report on the review of the capacity of local governments in the Pilbara to prevent, identify and deal with misconduct
- Recommendations
- 2
- Report length
- 44 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, pages 11 to 13
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission reviewed the capacity of all four Pilbara local governments to prevent and handle misconduct between 2010 and 2012.
It examined organisational systems, policies and practices rather than conducting a compliance audit or seeking individual misconduct cases.
The Commission found that all four councils were addressing their exposure, although their progress differed and earlier systematic prevention had been limited.
Its two recommendations sought continued development of comprehensive misconduct systems and progress reports to the Department of Local Government by 30 June 2013.
In the body's own words
- Opinion
The Commission views the work both planned and undertaken as positive.
- Conclusion
Whatever community perceptions about the existence of such cases, the review did not identify any.
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Recommendations 2
Recommendation 1
The Commission recommends that the Shire of Ashburton, the Shire of East Pilbara, the Town of Port Hedland and the Shire of Roebourne continue to develop a formal, comprehensive and effective misconduct management strategy and system.
Recommendation 2
The Commission recommends that by 30 June 2013, the Shire of Ashburton, the Shire of East Pilbara, the Town of Port Hedland and the Shire of Roebourne report their progress in developing effective misconduct management strategies and systems to the Department of Local Government.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.