Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report on the investigation of alleged public sector misconduct by Dr Nasrul Ameer Ali as a sessional academic employed by Curtin University of Technology

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Dated

Summary

The report's own summary: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, pages 11 to 24

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated an allegation that a Curtin University sessional academic sought sexual favours from a student in return for better marks.

    Report, page 11

  • It also examined the university’s systems for preventing and managing misconduct.

    Report, page 12

  • The Commission formed the opinion that the academic committed serious misconduct by seeking sexual favours from three students and disadvantaging another over a personal grievance.

    Report, page 19

  • The Commission concluded that deficiencies in recruitment, induction and supervision gave the academic opportunities to exploit overseas students.

    Report, page 111

  • It made five recommendations addressing international student support, assessment safeguards, a business school review, complaints management and academic staff practices.

    Report, page 112 · Report, page 113 · Report, page 114

In the body's own words

  1. Conclusion

    It is significant that, having been subjected to Dr Ali’s attempts to exploit them, none of the students knew where to go to complain about or report his actions.

    Report, page 111

  2. Finding

    There was a lack of protection and recourse afforded to these overseas students who were in a largely powerless situation when they were sexually pressured by Dr Ali.

    Report, page 20

Findings and recommendations

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

No findings or recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Read the report (PDF, 137 pages)

Published responses

No published response was found.

Official documents 2

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.