Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Misconduct handling procedures in the Western Australian public sector – WA Health

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Published

Opinions
5
Recommendations
4
Report length
153 pages

Summary

The report's own summary: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, pages 11 to 13

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

  • The Corruption and Crime Commission reviewed how the Department of Health managed misconduct across WA Health.

    Report, page 11

  • Its work included staff interviews and a survey, reviews of health service sites and an examination of restricted drug management.

    Report, page 11

  • The Commission found limited practical capacity to address misconduct and insufficient leadership of misconduct management.

    Report, page 11 · Report, page 124

  • It considered WA Health unable to demonstrate fair, reliable and transparent accountability for its handling of misconduct risks and incidents.

    Report, page 124

  • Its four recommendations sought a clear commitment and practical strategy, sufficient resources and cooperation with the Commission.

    Report, page 125

Opinions 5

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

  1. opinion of misconduct

    Opinion

    The Commission has formed the opinion that WA Health is currently unable to adequately account to the wider community for the way it manages misconduct risk and related occurrences of misconduct in a demonstrably fair, reliable and transparent way.

    Report, page 13

  2. opinion of misconduct

    Opinion

    On that basis, the Commission formed the opinion that PMH did not place sufficient weight on managing misconduct as part of its overall management strategy.

    Report, page 37

  3. opinion of misconduct

    Opinion

    On that basis, the Commission formed the opinion that WACHS-Kimberley did not place sufficient weight on managing misconduct as part of its overall management strategy.

    Report, page 44

  4. opinion of misconduct

    Opinion

    On the basis of the above observations, the Commission formed the opinion that the Department was not adequately managing misconduct at RPH.

    Report, page 83

  5. opinion of misconduct

    Opinion

    In light of these conclusions, the Commission has formed the opinion that WA Health is currently unable to adequately account to the wider community for the way it manages misconduct risk and related occurrences of misconduct in a demonstrably fair, reliable and transparent way.35 6.

    Report, page 124

Recommendations 4

  1. Recommendation 1

    That the Department of Health articulate and promote its commitment to managing misconduct throughout WA Health.

    Report, page 13

  2. Recommendation 2

    That the Department of Health, through the Senior Health Executive Forum, identify and commit to a strategy for managing misconduct, including a plan to give practical effect to that strategy.

    Report, page 13

  3. Recommendation 3

    That the Department of Health, through the Senior Executive Health Forum, commit sufficient resources to that strategy to make it work.

    Report, page 13

  4. Recommendation 4

    That the Department of Health work with the Commission to achieve progress.

    Report, page 13

Published responses

No published response was found.

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.
  • An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.