Report on investigation into inappropriate associations between Western Australia Police Officers and Pasquale Minniti
- Opinions
- 3
- Report length
- 84 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, pages 7 to 11
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Corruption and Crime Commission investigated allegations of inappropriate relationships between police officers and a Bayswater business proprietor.
The inquiry examined confidential information, assistance with traffic infringements and other services provided through those relationships.
The Commission formed misconduct opinions about two police officers and identified deficiencies in procedures for withdrawing infringements and accessing police information.
Its five recommendations covered an audit, conflicts of interest, confidential information, computer auditing and controls over infringement withdrawals and statutory declarations.
Report on investigation into inappropriate associations between Western Australia Police Officers and Pasquale Minniti.pdf, page 10 · Report on investigation into inappropriate associations between Western Australia Police Officers and Pasquale Minniti.pdf, page 11
Opinions 3
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
opinion of misconduct
OpinionAfter “assessing” all the material obtained during the course of the investigation, including telecommunications interceptions, the Commission is of the opinion that Mr D’Orazio’s actions do not amount to “misconduct” as defined by section 4 of the Corruption and Crime Commission Act 2003 (the CCC Act) in respect to these matters.
opinion of misconduct
OpinionAs a result of it’s investigation, the Commission formed the opinion that two police officers, Senior Constable Arduino Silvestri and Sergeant Bill Harrison, engaged in misconduct.
opinion of misconduct
OpinionAfter assessing all of the information obtained during the course of the investigation, the Commission is of the opinion that Mr D’Orazio has not committed an act of “misconduct” as defined by section 4 of the CCC Act in respect to these matters.
Recommendations
No recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Notes on this record
- Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
- An opinion that misconduct has occurred is not, and is not to be taken as, a finding or opinion that a person has committed a criminal or disciplinary offence (Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003, s 217A; s 23 in reports made under the Act as first enacted).
Coverage
This publisher
- The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
- Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
- The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
- Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
- No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.