Skip to content

OPAX is on iPhone and iPad. Get the app

Menu

Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks

Report · Corruption and Crime Commission (WA CCC) · Western Australia · Published

Recommendations
7
Report length
11 pages

Official source

Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks

PDF · 11 pages · 182 KB · ccc.wa.gov.au

Summary

Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.

In the body's own words

  1. Conclusion

    Although there was serious misconduct in this case, the Commission’s investigation was unable to identify the source of the information leak.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 8

  2. Conclusion

    Therefore, the Commission has concluded that there is not an adequate legislative base for the prosecution of persons involved in the unauthorised access and disclosure of official information.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 6

Findings, opinions and statements

Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.

No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.

Recommendations 7

  1. Recommendation 1

    It is recommended that s.81 of The Criminal Code be amended to include non-SES organisations.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 9

  2. Recommendation 2

    It is recommended that codes of conduct be modified to specify a particular duty not to disclose corporate or confidential information inappropriately.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 9

  3. Recommendation 3

    It is recommended that Administrative Instruction 711 be repealed and replaced with a more specific and relevant Instruction.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 9

  4. Recommendation 4

    It is recommended that the disciplinary provisions of the PSM Act be repealed and replaced with provisions that are more in keeping with normal contracts of employment.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 10

  5. Recommendation 5

    In order to ensure adequate selection, induction and training of staff DTF should: • Conduct pre-employment screening or security vetting commensurate with each new employee’s access to confidential information;

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 10

  6. Recommendation 6

    To enable the strategic release of information without undermining public sector accountability and confidence it is recommended that DTF develop and apply clear, concise and well-communicated policy and procedures on the release of information to the media.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 11

  7. Recommendation 7

    It is recommended that DTF review current organisational security policies, procedures and systems and develop new policies, procedures and systems in line with AS/NZS ISO/IEC 17799:2001 Information technology – Code of Practice for Information Security Management.

    Report on Investigation into Department of Treasury Leaks.pdf, page 11

Published responses

No published response was found.

Notes on this record

  • Report type assigned by OPAX from the title; the Commission tags every listing item Report.
  • Date is the date the Commission's report page was published; the report states no date OPAX read.

Coverage

This publisher

  • The Commission's website has no copyright or licence page; reports carry the Commission's copyright notice (fair dealing only), so OPAX keeps short verbatim extracts with citations and links the original PDFs.
  • Only the reports listing (/publications/reports) is covered. Annual reports, quarterly reports filed under /quarterly-reports, media releases and news items are not report records.
  • The listing date is the date the Commission's page was created; the record date is the report's cover date or the tabling date stated on the page where one is given, and the listing date only as a fallback.
  • Opinions are extracted only where the Commission states them in a sentence on a single page; opinions in older reports framed differently, or split over a page break, are not extracted (findings not_extracted).
  • No text layer, no OCR: scanned reports have no extracted opinions or recommendations.