Buying trust: Corruption risks in public sector procurement
- Recommendations
- 18
- Report length
- 78 pages
Summary
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
South Australia’s Independent Commission Against Corruption studied corruption risks in public procurement to identify warning signs and improve prevention.
It examined survey comments, submissions, referrals and other integrity agencies’ findings about procurement.
The Commission concluded that suspected corruption was too often overlooked and that reluctance to report and poor awareness could contribute.
Its 18 recommendations covered procurement audits, training, conflicts of interest, gifts, confidential information, decision records and reporting obligations.
Report, page 8 · Report, page 10 · Report, page 11 · Report, page 12
In the body's own words
- Conclusion
These warning signs do not necessarily constitute corruption per se.
- Conclusion
However, they should prompt public officers to make further enquiries and report suspicious conduct.
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Recommendations 18
Recommendation 1
Public authorities conduct regular procurement audits based on the risk profile of their procurement activities. High risk procurements may include those where the number of suppliers able to tender is limited, extensions or variations are utilised, an incumbent supplier has been reengaged, and those conducted with urgency or in emergencies. Procurements under $55,000 should be regularly audited for evidence of tender splitting.
Recommendation 2
Public authorities prevent non-Aboriginal suppliers taking unfair advantage of schemes intended to assist Aboriginal suppliers to win public sector contracts by verifying the status of suppliers claiming Aboriginal identity.
Recommendation 3
Where relevant, public authorities conduct random audits of contracts that are required to have a mandated proportion of labour force hours to be performed by nominated groups.1 Non-compliance needs to be reported to the Office of the Industry Advocate.
Recommendation 4
All public officers involved in procurement, including those with delegation authority, complete training on probity in procurement. This should include training on corruption risks in procurement, conflicts of interests, gifts, benefits and hospitality, the handling of confidential information and public officers’ reporting obligations.
Recommendation 5
Public authorities ensure that if a participant in a procurement discloses a conflict of interests, a management plan is devised, documented, actioned and monitored.
Recommendation 6
Public authorities consider control measures to address post separation conflicts of interests for public sector employees in high risk roles, including exiting procedures, information access restrictions and monitoring, or the use of restraint clauses where reasonable.
Recommendation 7
The Commissioner for Public Sector Employment ensure that the Gifts and Benefits Guideline is consistent with that provided by Procurement Services SA, which recommends that public officers in high risk roles do not accept gifts, benefits or hospitality.
Recommendation 8
Public authorities ensure that internal policies include advice regarding the handling and recording of gifts, benefits and hospitality offered by suppliers in high risk functions including procurement.
Recommendation 9
Public authorities ensure they are complying with Premier and Cabinet Circular PC035 – Proactive disclosure of regularly requested information, including publication of information on agencies’ websites.
Recommendation 10
Procurement Services SA continue its development and implementation of a Code of Conduct for suppliers.
Recommendation 11
Public authorities conduct regular audits of staff permissions, access and use of confidential procurement information to identify patterns of unusual activity or instances of misuse.
Recommendation 12
Procurement Services SA consider the need for guidance on the proper management and protection of intellectual property during procurement processes.
Recommendation 13
Entities that control panels and multi-use supplier lists vet new suppliers, regularly review existing suppliers on a panel or list, and remove suppliers if they no longer fit relevant criteria or conditions.
Recommendation 14
Public authorities consider and limit public officers’ discretion over procurements and financial decision making, and ensure appropriate segregations and separations are in place.
Recommendation 15
Public authorities conduct regular audits of procurement record keeping, including ensuring all procurement decision making is documented with reasons, and relevant written and verbal communication with suppliers is recorded.
Recommendation 16
Procurement Services SA consider expanding its capacity to assist agencies that require additional support to undertake procurements, especially where that assistance would help safeguard procurements from impropriety.
Recommendation 17
Public authorities ensure they have emergency situation procurement frameworks in place and published on their websites.
Recommendation 18
Public authorities provide suppliers with information on internal reporting policies and procedures and suppliers’ reporting obligations as public officers. Public authorities ensure that contractors provide corresponding induction material to their subcontractors.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Coverage
This publisher
- Office for Public Integrity: publishes only its annual reports (excluded); no OPI report or statement records.
- Since October 2021 the Commission does not make findings of corrupt conduct; most records have no findings.
- Government and agency responses are recorded only where the Commission's page links them or the report reproduces them; implementation status is not published by the Commission as structured data.
- Scanned reports without a text layer are not read (no OCR); their recommendations stay not_extracted.
- Recommendations are extracted only from numbered 'Recommendation N' lists; reports that set out recommendations in prose, tables or unnumbered lists keep recommendations_status not_extracted.
- Findings are extracted only from investigation reports that state them in the Commissioner's own words (Oakden 2018, Gillman 2015); public statements are not read for findings.