Taskforce Flaxton
- Recommendations
- 33
- Published responses
- 1
- Report length
- 86 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: Summary and recommendations, pages 12 to 18
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Crime and Corruption Commission established Taskforce Flaxton to examine corruption risks in Queensland prisons and identify reforms.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 9
The inquiry examined prison operations, the rules governing them and ways to prevent and respond to corruption.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 12
The CCC found that overcrowding increased corruption risks and considered the existing prison anti-corruption framework ineffective.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 12
Its 33 recommendations addressed Queensland Corrective Services performance and external oversight.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 9
In the body's own words
- Finding
The CCC found that unique features of the prison environment create corruption risk.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 12
- Opinion
The CCC is of the view that alleviating prison overcrowding is essential to reducing corruption risk and corruption in Queensland prisons.
Taskforce Flaxton - an examination of corruption risks and corruption in Queensland prisons, page 12
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Recommendations 33
Recommendation 1
That QCS: (a) develop a comprehensive measurement strategy to assess the performance of its anti- corruption strategy (b) incorporate anti-corruption performance reporting into appropriate governance committees to ensure appropriate oversight (c) publicly report anti-corruption performance outcomes.
Recommendation 2
That QCS revise the way it measures the performance of prisons. The performance framework should: (a) use consistent performance standards and a consistent performance measurement approach across all Queensland prisons (b) include all appropriate cost, input, output, and outcome key performance indicators (including integrity measures and data quality measures) (c) include strategies to improve data availability and data quality (d) provide greater public access to performance indicators and performance reports.
Recommendation 3
That QCS review its risk management framework to improve the identification, management and oversight of corruption risk.
Recommendation 4
That QCS review its organisational structure to: (a) support the delivery of its ten year strategy (b) provide greater role and function clarity (including span of control, reporting lines, delegations and authorisations, employee performance management) (c) be sufficiently agile to accommodate future changes in the agency’s strategy (d) improve standards, drive performance and deliver efficiencies (e) promote internal communication.
Recommendation 5
That, at a minimum, the following functions be centrally controlled and services delivered in line with Service Level Standards: (a) human resources, including the QCS Academy, workforce planning and talent management and rostering (b) finance, including contract management and procurement (c) information technology and digital services (d) facilities and assets (e) ethical standards (f) intelligence.
Recommendation 6
That: (a) QCS establish an organisational-wide cultural change program to assess current culture, create a shared vision of the ideal culture, develop and implement initiatives to support cultural change, and monitor and report on the implementation of initiatives and cultural change (b) the organisational-wide cultural change program be monitored by the QCS Board of Management to ensure alignment of culture, strategic intent and performance priorities, and to ensure the program is adequately resourced.
Recommendation 7
That: (a) QCS, as contract manager on behalf of the State of Queensland, and private prison providers agree and implement a universal set of culture indicators (b) each prison measure culture on an annual basis and publicly release these findings.
Recommendation 8
That QCS: (a) commission an independent capability review to assess the agency’s capability to efficiently and effectively deliver its strategic intent (b) develop strategies to address capability gaps (particularly human resources, information and communication technology, operational performance reporting and ethical standards) (c) monitor strategy development, implementation and outcomes at the QCS Board of Management.
Recommendation 9
That QCS: (a) establish a centralised function responsible for policy and practice management throughout the agency to promote performance standards and consistency (b) review Custodial Operations Practice Directives and local instructions to improve clarity and consistency.
Recommendation 10
That: (a) Queensland Health implement the recommendations of the Offender Health Services Review Final Report (b) QCS support the implementation of the recommendations of the Offender Health Services Review Final Report (c) QCS and Queensland Health jointly identify aspects of the QCS operating model (systems, policies and practices) that undermine the delivery of prisoner health services and QCS, where feasible, change systems, policies or practices to facilitate better prisoner health outcomes.
Recommendation 11
That QCS develop an agency-specific Code of Practice to complement the Code of Conduct.
Recommendation 12
That QCS: (a) include QCS values in human resource policy and practice (including recruitment and selection and performance management) (b) review recruitment and selection policy and practice to ensure they are meritorious and transparent (c) strengthen pre-employment screening, vetting and probity processes.
Recommendation 13
That QCS develop and implement a formal first year correctional officer graduate program to minimise early exposure to higher-risk environments and provide greater support, training and oversight during initial operational placement.
Recommendation 14
That QCS review mandatory refresher training to include training that responds to the needs of the prisoner cohort and targets high-risk corruption areas.
Recommendation 15
That QCS develop a staff rotation policy to reduce corruption risk, promote professional development and enhance performance.
Recommendation 16
That QCS: (a) establish overtime policies and procedures to reduce opportunities for manipulation (b) review the staffing model in prisons to provide greater flexibility, reduce the need for overtime and support the recommendations proposed in this report (c) establish performance standards for overtime and include overtime as a key performance indicator for prison performance.
Recommendation 17
That QCS: (a) implement an agency-wide, electronic system to record conflicts of interest and management action (b) develop and implement a declarable association policy.
Recommendation 18
That the Corrective Services Act 2006 be amended to permit an appropriate QCS delegate to direct a person (other than a prisoner) at or entering a prison to submit to a prescribed alcohol/drug test.
Recommendation 19
That QCS develop an integrity testing regime to identify and strengthen deficient systems and processes, and support the investigation of people suspected of engaging in corrupt conduct.
Recommendation 20
That the Corrective Services Act 2006 be amended to grant broader powers to search staff working in prisons.
Recommendation 21
That QCS establish a dedicated human source unit and review its human source management policy and process to comply with contemporary practice standards.
Recommendation 22
That QCS review property and exhibit management policies and practices to decrease corruption risk, improve evidentiary value and align with modern standards.
Recommendation 23
That QCS: (a) review closed circuit television coverage to reduce high-risk blind spots (b) replace outdated closed circuit television technology to ensure all cameras have the ability to record video footage.
Recommendation 24
That QCS: (a) increase the number of body worn cameras used in Queensland prisons (b) revise the body worn camera policy to clearly state when activation is mandatory.
Recommendation 25
That QCS increase video conference capacity in prisons to reduce the need to transport prisoners to court and health services.
Recommendation 26
That QCS implement an electronic mail process to decrease the volume of mail entering prisons via the postal service.
Recommendation 27
That QCS: (a) replace the Integrated Offender Management System with a system that meets recognised information management and security standards (b) in the interim, and with priority, implement “remediation strategies” to reduce the risk that prisoner information can be inappropriately accessed and released (c) identify information management as a strategic risk.
Recommendation 28
That QCS: (a) establish an agency-specific Public Interest Disclosure policy and process (b) review the processes and supports available to witnesses and disclosers who are employees (c) improve complaint management processes (consistent with the recommendations made by the Queensland Ombudsman in 2016).
Recommendation 29
That QCS review prisoner complaint processes to: (a) improve prisoner understanding of complaint processes (b) increase prisoner confidence in the process (with specific objectives of providing confidentiality and reducing the fear of reprisal) (c) provide greater consistency across prisons.
Recommendation 30
That QCS: (a) broaden the remit of the Ethical Standards Unit to provide the following functions: prevention and early intervention, professional standards, integrity policy framework, complaints management, investigation, discipline system, witness support, critical incidents, covert operations, and risk management (b) review the resources, capabilities, systems and processes required to deliver this broader remit (c) implement a staffing model that reduces the risk that staff working in the Ethical Standards Unit will be captured by those who seek to influence the proper delivery of its functions (d) review the discipline process to improve timeliness and provide greater consistency for decisions (e) establish a discipline unit, reporting to the QCS Commissioner and independent from the Ethical Standards Unit, to deal with discipline matters and develop sanction matrices.
Recommendation 31
That QCS: (a) establish, within the Ethical Standards Unit, dedicated intelligence staff to focus on staff corruption and integrity (b) align methodologies, systems and processes used to support the intelligence function with contemporary practice standards (c) centralise the intelligence function (see also Recommendation 5(f)) (d) review policies, systems and processes to appropriately secure intelligence information (e) review the intelligence establishment and rostering model to provide an increased level of service to prisons.
Recommendation 32
That QCS and Queensland Police Service (QPS) collaboratively review the service delivery model used to investigate criminal offences in prisons. The revised model should: (a) adequately describe the role and function of the Corrective Services Investigation Unit to assist in performance reporting and review (b) ensure that only appropriate incidents are referred to the QPS for investigation (c) ensure that matters are assessed, investigated and resolved in a timely manner (d) maximise information sharing between QPS and QCS (e) reduce corruption risk for QPS investigators working in prisons (f) facilitate the use of innovative investigative methods.
Recommendation 33
The CCC recommends: (a) the establishment of a properly resourced Independent Inspectorate of Prisons (b) the development of nationally consistent inspection standards, cycles, methods and reporting templates (c) inspection reports be made publicly available.
Published responses 1
Government Response
Hearing transcripts: evidence, not findings 36
What a witness or counsel says at a hearing is evidence or submission, not a finding. Transcripts are the publisher's copies, including its redactions, listed newest first by month.
- Case
- Taskforce Flaxton
- Hearings page
- Hearings page on ccc.qld.gov.au
About these copies
- Kind
- Official public hearing transcript
- How OPAX got them
- manual publisher download supplied by the OPAX maintainer, 12 Nov 2026
- Rights
- Public hearing copies published by the Commission, subject to the notices on each document and to current publication orders. Some covers prohibit copying or distribution except as the presiding officer orders, and the website's general CC BY licence does not override those notices. OPAX links to the publisher's copy.
November 2018
August 2018
May 2018
Hearing transcript, 30 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 30 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 30 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 29 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 29 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 29 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 28 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 28 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 28 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 25 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 25 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 25 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 24 May 2018 (part 1 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 24 May 2018 (part 2 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 23 May 2018
Hearing transcript, 22 May 2018 (part 1 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 22 May 2018 (part 2 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 21 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 21 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 21 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 18 May 2018 (part 1 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 18 May 2018 (part 2 of 2)
Hearing transcript, 17 May 2018
Hearing transcript, 16 May 2018 (part 1 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 16 May 2018 (part 2 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 16 May 2018 (part 3 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 16 May 2018 (part 4 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 15 May 2018 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 15 May 2018 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 15 May 2018 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 14 May 2018
Coverage
This publisher
- Reports from 1991 to about 2011 are listed on the CCC site but many pages link no report document; those records carry the page summary only, with findings and recommendations not extracted.
- Scanned reports without a text layer are not OCR'd; their findings and recommendations are not extracted.
- Findings and opinions are not extracted except where a report states it makes no finding about any person (section 48B of the Crime and Corruption Act 2001). Pre-2025 reports state outcomes in narrative form, which is not converted into findings.
- Recommendations are extracted only from a complete numbered run; reports that number recommendations differently, or set them inside narrative chapters only, are marked not_extracted.
- Government responses are recorded where the CCC report or public hearing page links one; the responses themselves (often Queensland Parliament tabled papers or ministerial statements) are linked, not fetched.
- The 1989 Fitzgerald Inquiry report, which the CCC hosts, is a commission of inquiry report and is not included here.