Operation Belcarra - A blueprint for integrity and addressing corruption risk in local government
- Recommendations
- 31
- Published responses
- 1
- Report length
- 162 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: Summary and recommendations, pages 13 to 20
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Crime and Corruption Commission began Operation Belcarra after complaints about candidates in Queensland’s 2016 council elections.
It investigated possible electoral offences and examined practices that could undermine confidence in local government.
The CCC found unequal campaign competition, unclear candidate affiliations and weaknesses in donation disclosure and enforcement.
The CCC made 31 recommendations addressing election funding, disclosure, conflicts of interest and electoral oversight.
Report, page 14 · Report, page 15 · Report, page 16 · Report, page 17 · Report, page 18 · Report, page 19 · Report, page 20
In the body's own words
- Finding
There is uneven competition between candidates in Queensland council elections, particularly with respect to campaign funding.
- Finding
There are considerable deficiencies in the compliance and enforcement framework for local government elections in Queensland.
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Recommendations 31
Recommendation 1
That an appropriate Parliamentary Committee review the feasibility of introducing expenditure caps for Queensland local government elections. Without limiting the scope of the review, the review should consider: (a) expenditure caps for candidates, groups of candidates, third parties, political parties and associated entities (b) the merit of having different expenditure caps for incumbent versus new candidates (c) practices in other jurisdictions.
Recommendation 2
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require real-time disclosure of electoral expenditure by candidates, groups of candidates, political parties and associated entities at local government elections. The disclosure scheme should ensure that: (a) all expenditure, including that currently required to be disclosed by third parties, is disclosed within seven business days of the date the expenditure is incurred, or immediately if the expenditure is incurred within the seven business days before polling day (b) all expenditure disclosures are made publicly available by the ECQ as soon as practicable, or immediately if the disclosure is provided within the seven business days before polling day.
Recommendation 3
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to: (a) require all candidates, as part of their nomination, to provide to the ECQ a declaration of interests containing the same financial and non-financial particulars mentioned in Schedule 5 of the Local Government Regulation 2012 and Schedule 3 of the City of Brisbane Regulation 2012, and also: - for candidates who are currently members of a political party, body or association, and/or trade or professional organisation — the date from which the candidate has been a member - for candidates who were previously members of a political party, body or association, and/or trade or professional organisation — the name and address of the entity and the dates between which the candidate was a member. Failure to do so would mean that a person is not properly nominated as a candidate. For the purposes of this requirement, Schedule 5, section 17 of the Local Government Regulation and Schedule 3, section 17 of the City of Brisbane Regulation should apply to the candidate as if they are an elected councillor. (b) require candidates to advise the ECQ of any new interest or change to an existing interest within seven business days, or immediately if the new interest or change to an existing interest occurs within the seven business days before polling day. (c) make it an offence for a candidate to fail to declare an interest or to fail to notify the ECQ of a change to an interest within the required time frame, with prosecutions able to be started at any time within four years after the offence was committed, consistent with the current limitation period for offences about disclosure returns. A suitable penalty should apply, including possible removal from office.
Recommendation 4
That the ECQ: (a) publish all declarations of interests on the ECQ website as soon as practicable after the close of nominations for an election (b) ensure that any changes to a candidate’s declaration of interests are published as soon as practicable after being notified, or immediately if advised within the seven business days before polling day.
Recommendation 5
That: (a) the definition of a group of candidates in the Schedule of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended so that a group of candidates is defined by the behaviours of the group and/or its members rather than the purposes for which the group was formed. For example: A group of candidates means a group of individuals, each of whom is a candidate for the election, where the candidates: • receive the majority of their campaign funding from a common or shared source; or • have a common or shared campaign strategy (e.g. shared policies, common slogans and branding); or • use common or shared campaign resources (e.g. campaign workers, signs); or • engage in cooperative campaigning activities, including using shared how-to-vote cards, engaging in joint advertising (e.g. on billboards) or formally endorsing another candidate. (b) consequential amendments be made to the Local Government Electoral Act, including with respect to the recording of membership and agents for groups of candidates (ss. 41–3), to account for the possibility that a group of candidates may be formed at any time before an election, including after the cutoff for candidate nominations.
Recommendation 6
That the definition of relevant details in section 109 of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to state that, for a gift derived wholly or in part from a source [other than a person identified by s. 109(b)(iii)] intended to be used for a political purpose related to the local government election, the relevant details required also include the relevant details of each person or entity who was a source of the gift. Section 120(6) regarding loans should be similarly amended to reflect this requirement.
Recommendation 7
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to deem that a gift and the source of the gift referred to in Recommendation 6 is at all times within the knowledge of the person or entity required to lodge a return under Part 6 and for the purpose of proving any offence against Part 9, Divisions 5–7.
Recommendation 8
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require all gift recipients, within seven business days of receiving a gift requiring a third party return under section 124 of the LGE Act, to notify the donor of their disclosure obligations. A suitable penalty should apply.
Recommendation 9
That the ECQ develop a pro-forma letter or information sheet that gift recipients can give to donors that explains third parties’ disclosure obligations and how these can be fulfilled.
Recommendation 10
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require candidates, groups of candidates and third parties to prospectively notify any proposed donor of the candidate’s, group’s or third party’s disclosure obligations under section 117, 118 or 125 of the LGE Act.
Recommendation 11
That the ECQ revises the handbooks and any other written information it gives candidates, third parties or others about their obligations in local government elections to ensure that these obligations are clearly communicated in plain English.
Recommendation 12
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to make attendance at a DILGP information session a mandatory requirement of nomination.
Recommendation 13
That the ECQ amends a) its paper disclosure return forms and b) the Electronic Disclosure System submission form (as relevant to local government) to ensure they: (a) adequately and accurately reflect all relevant requirements in Part 6 of the Local Government Electoral Act (b) contain clear and sufficiently detailed instructions to users to facilitate their compliance with these requirements.
Recommendation 14
That sections 126 and 127 of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to expressly prohibit candidates and groups of candidates from using a credit card to pay for campaign expenses. Candidates would be permitted to use debit cards attached to their dedicated account.
Recommendation 15
That: (a) section 27(2) of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require candidates’ nominations to also contain the details of the candidate’s dedicated account under section 126 of the LGE Act (b) section 41(3) of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require the record for a group of candidates to also state the details of the group’s dedicated account under section 127 of the LGE Act.
Recommendation 16
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to: (a) prohibit candidates, groups of candidates, third parties, political parties and associated entities from receiving gifts or loans in respect of an election within the seven business days before polling day for that election and at any time thereafter (b) state that, if a candidate, group of candidates, third party, political party or associated entity receives a gift or loan in contravention of the above, an amount equal to the value of the gift or loan is payable to the State and may be recovered by the State as a debt owing to the local government, consistent with the provisions relating to accepting anonymous donations [s. 119(4), LGE Act] and loans without prescribed records [s. 121(4), LGE Act].
Recommendation 17
That the ECQ: (a) makes the maximum amount of donation disclosure data available on its website (b) provides comprehensive search functions and analytical tools to help users identify and examine patterns and trends in donations (c) provides information to enhance users’ understanding of donation disclosure data and facilitate its interpretation.
Recommendation 18
That the definition of relevant details in section 109 of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to include: (a) for a gift made by an individual, the individual’s occupation and employer (if applicable) (b) for a gift purportedly made by a company, the names and residential or business addresses of the company’s directors (or the directors of the controlling entity), and a description of the nature of the company’s business (c) for all gifts, a statement as to whether or not the person or other entity making the gift, or a related entity, currently has any business with, or matter or application under consideration by, the relevant council. Section 120(6) regarding loans should be similarly amended to reflect these requirements.
Recommendation 19
That section 124(3)(b)(iii) of the Local Government Electoral Act be amended to require the following details to be stated in a third party’s return about expenditure, in lieu of the purpose of the expenditure as currently required: (a) whether the expenditure was used to benefit/support a particular candidate, group of candidates, political party or issue agenda, or to oppose a particular candidate, group of candidates, political party or issue agenda (b) the name of the candidate, group of candidates, political party or issue agenda that the expenditure benefitted/supported or opposed (c) the name and residential or business address of the service provider or product supplier to whom the expenditure was paid (if applicable).
Recommendation 20
That the Local Government Electoral Act, the Local Government Act and the City of Brisbane Act be amended to prohibit candidates, groups of candidates, third parties, political parties, associated entities and councillors from receiving gifts from property developers. This prohibition should reflect the New South Wales provisions as far as possible, including in defining a property developer (s. 96GB, Election Funding, Expenditure and Disclosures Act 1981), making a range of donations unlawful, including a person making a donation on behalf of a prohibited donor and a prohibited donor soliciting another person to make a donation (s. 96GA), and making it an offence for a person to circumvent or attempt to circumvent the legislation (s. 96HB). Prosecutions for relevant offences should be able to be started at any time within four years after the offence was committed and suitable penalties should apply, including possible removal from office for councillors.
Recommendation 21
That the Local Government Act and the City of Brisbane Act be amended to deem that a gift and the source of the gift referred to in Recommendation 6 is at all times within the knowledge of the councillor for the purposes of Chapter 6, Part 2, Divisions 5 and 6.
Recommendation 22
That the Planning Act 2016 be amended to require that any application under Chapters 2 to 5: (a) include a statement as to whether or not the applicant or any entity directly or indirectly related to the applicant has previously made a declarable gift or incurred other declarable electoral expenditure relevant to an election for the local government that has an interest in the application (b) any application made to council by a company include the names and residential or business addresses of the company’s directors (or the directors of the controlling entity). A local government has an interest in the application if it or a local government councillor, employee, contractor or approved entity is: an affected owner; an affected entity; an affected party; an assessment manager; a building certifier; a chosen assessment manager; a prescribed assessment manager; a decision-maker; a referral agency; or a responsible entity.
Recommendation 23
That section 173 of the Local Government Act and section 175 of the City of Brisbane Act be amended so that, after a councillor declares a conflict of interest, or where another councillor has reported the councillor’s conflict of interest as required by the implementation of Recommendation 24, other persons entitled to vote at the meeting are required to decide: (a) whether the councillor has a real or perceived conflict of interest in the matter (b) whether the councillor should leave the meeting room and stay out of the meeting room while the matter is being discussed and voted on, or whether the councillor should remain in the meeting room to discuss and vote on the matter. A councillor who stays in the room to discuss and vote on the matter in accordance with the decision does not commit an offence under the proposed Recommendation 26. The views put forward by each other person and the final decision of the group should be recorded in the minutes of the meeting.
Recommendation 24
That the Local Government Act and the City of Brisbane Act be amended to: (a) require any councillor who knows or reasonably suspects that another councillor has a conflict of interest or material personal interest in a matter before the council to report this to the person presiding over the meeting (for a conflict of interest or material personal interest arising at a meeting) or the Chief Executive Officer of the council (b) require the Chief Executive Officer, after receiving a report of a conflict of interest or a material personal interest relevant to a matter to be discussed at a council meeting, to report this to the person presiding over the meeting.
Recommendation 25
That the Local Government Act and the City of Brisbane Act be amended to provide suitable penalties for councillors who fail to comply with their obligations regarding conflicts of interest, including possible removal from office.
Recommendation 26
That the Local Government Act and the City of Brisbane Act be amended so that, where a councillor has a real or perceived conflict of interest in a matter, it is an offence for the councillor to influence or attempt to influence any decision by another councillor or a council employee in relation to that matter at any point after the matter appears on an agenda for a council meeting (except in the circumstances described in Recommendation 23, part b). A suitable penalty should apply, including possible removal from office.
Recommendation 27
That the Local Government Liaison Group recommended by the Councillor Complaints Review Panel be established as soon as practicable.
Recommendation 28
That: (a) the advisory and public awareness functions of the Queensland Integrity Commissioner under the Integrity Act 2009 be extended to local government councillors (b) or alternatively, a separate statutory body be established for local government with advisory and public awareness functions equivalent to those of the Queensland Integrity Commissioner under the Integrity Act 2009.
Recommendation 29
That the Local Government Electoral Act be amended so that prosecutions for offences related to dedicated accounts (ss. 126 and 127) and groups of candidates (s. 183) may be started at any time within four years after the offence was committed, consistent with the current limitation period for offences about disclosure returns.
Recommendation 30
That the penalties in the Local Government Electoral Act for offences including funding and disclosure offences be increased to provide an adequate deterrent to non-compliance. For councillors, removal from office should be considered.
Recommendation 31
That the ECQ be given a specific legislative function to help ensure integrity and transparency in local government elections and that: (a) how the ECQ is to perform this function be specified in legislation; this should include engaging with participants in local government elections to promote their compliance with the requirements of the Local Government Electoral Act, investigating offences under the Local Government Electoral Act, and taking enforcement actions against candidates, third parties and others who commit offences (b) the ECQ be required to publicly report on the activities conducted under this function after each local government quadrennial election, including reporting on the outcomes of its compliance monitoring and enforcement activities (c) the ECQ be given adequate resources to perform this function.
Published responses 1
Government response
Official documents 2
Operation Belcarra - A blueprint for integrity and addressing corruption risk in local government
Document details
- Role
- Report
Operation Belcarra - A blueprint for integrity and addressing corruption risk in local government
Document details
- Role
- Volume
Hearing transcripts: evidence, not findings 39
What a witness or counsel says at a hearing is evidence or submission, not a finding. Transcripts are the publisher's copies, including its redactions, listed newest first by month.
- Case
- Operation Belcarra: Reforming local government in Queensland
- Hearings page
- Hearings page on ccc.qld.gov.au
About these copies
- Kind
- Official public hearing transcript
- How OPAX got them
- manual publisher download supplied by the OPAX maintainer, 12 Nov 2026
- Rights
- Public hearing copies published by the Commission, subject to the notices on each document and to current publication orders. Some covers prohibit copying or distribution except as the presiding officer orders, and the website's general CC BY licence does not override those notices. OPAX links to the publisher's copy.
June 2017
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 1 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 2 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 3 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 4 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 5 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 14 June 2017 (part 6 of 6)
The hearing date is the one printed on the transcript's cover; the publisher's file name or link label gives a different date.
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 1 of 6)
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 2 of 6)
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 3 of 6)
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 4 of 6)
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 5 of 6)
Hearing transcript, 13 June 2017 (part 6 of 6)
April 2017
Hearing transcript, 28 April 2017 (part 1 of 5)
Hearing transcript, 28 April 2017 (part 2 of 5)
Hearing transcript, 28 April 2017 (part 3 of 5)
Hearing transcript, 28 April 2017 (part 4 of 5)
Hearing transcript, 28 April 2017 (part 5 of 5)
Hearing transcript, 27 April 2017 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 27 April 2017 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 27 April 2017 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 26 April 2017 (part 1 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 26 April 2017 (part 2 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 26 April 2017 (part 3 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 26 April 2017 (part 4 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 21 April 2017 (part 1 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 21 April 2017 (part 2 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 21 April 2017 (part 3 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 21 April 2017 (part 4 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 20 April 2017 (part 1 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 20 April 2017 (part 2 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 20 April 2017 (part 3 of 3)
Hearing transcript, 19 April 2017 (part 1 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 19 April 2017 (part 2 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 19 April 2017 (part 3 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 19 April 2017 (part 4 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 18 April 2017 (part 1 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 18 April 2017 (part 2 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 18 April 2017 (part 3 of 4)
Hearing transcript, 18 April 2017 (part 4 of 4)
Coverage
This publisher
- Reports from 1991 to about 2011 are listed on the CCC site but many pages link no report document; those records carry the page summary only, with findings and recommendations not extracted.
- Scanned reports without a text layer are not OCR'd; their findings and recommendations are not extracted.
- Findings and opinions are not extracted except where a report states it makes no finding about any person (section 48B of the Crime and Corruption Act 2001). Pre-2025 reports state outcomes in narrative form, which is not converted into findings.
- Recommendations are extracted only from a complete numbered run; reports that number recommendations differently, or set them inside narrative chapters only, are marked not_extracted.
- Government responses are recorded where the CCC report or public hearing page links one; the responses themselves (often Queensland Parliament tabled papers or ministerial statements) are linked, not fetched.
- The 1989 Fitzgerald Inquiry report, which the CCC hosts, is a commission of inquiry report and is not included here.