Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring order report
- Report length
- 68 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: Summary, pages 10 to 16
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Crime and Misconduct Commission reviewed community safety planning as a follow-up to its Restoring order inquiry.
It examined community safety plans and local police planning in nine Indigenous communities, including priorities, strategies and opportunities to prevent crime.
Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 10 · Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 11
The CMC found slow progress, limited community engagement and unclear responsibility for implementing and monitoring plans.
Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 11 · Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 12 · Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 16
The CMC made no formal recommendations, instead proposing better community engagement, implementation, evaluation and public reporting.
Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 15 · Community safety planning in Queensland’s Indigenous communities: A follow-up to the Restoring Order report (June 2014), page 16
In the body's own words
- Finding
Of the planning processes that we examined for this review, only one had progressed to implementation.
- Finding
Overall, we found responsibility and accountability for strategy implementation is often unclear, performance measurement appears to be poorly understood and there is general uncertainty about whether monitoring and reporting progress against the plan is a priority.
Findings and recommendations
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings or recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Published responses
No published response was found.
Coverage
This publisher
- Reports from 1991 to about 2011 are listed on the CCC site but many pages link no report document; those records carry the page summary only, with findings and recommendations not extracted.
- Scanned reports without a text layer are not OCR'd; their findings and recommendations are not extracted.
- Findings and opinions are not extracted except where a report states it makes no finding about any person (section 48B of the Crime and Corruption Act 2001). Pre-2025 reports state outcomes in narrative form, which is not converted into findings.
- Recommendations are extracted only from a complete numbered run; reports that number recommendations differently, or set them inside narrative chapters only, are marked not_extracted.
- Government responses are recorded where the CCC report or public hearing page links one; the responses themselves (often Queensland Parliament tabled papers or ministerial statements) are linked, not fetched.
- The 1989 Fitzgerald Inquiry report, which the CCC hosts, is a commission of inquiry report and is not included here.