Investigation into complaints of corruption in the management of water in NSW and systemic non-compliance with the Water Management Act 2000 (Operation Avon)
- Recommendations
- 15
- Published responses
- 3
- Report length
- 168 pages
Findings, opinions and statements
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
The report states that it makes no findings.
Recommendations 15
Recommendation 1
That the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) publicly records: its water strategy, objectives and priorities for the use and management of NSW’s water resources in a manner consistent with the mandatory duty in s 9 of the Water Management Act 2000 (WMA) the need to ensure the water management principles in s 5, and in particular those that relate to sharing, as set out in s 5(3) of the WMA, are all given effect. Section 9 of the WMA should also inform relevant key departmental records, including agency policies, guidelines and role descriptions, concerning the management of NSW water resources.
Recommendation 2
That the DPIE develops and publishes a protocol and procedures for amending WSPs that reflect the principles for water sharing in s 5(3) of the WMA and give priority to those principles in the order in which they are set out in that subsection in accordance with the mandatory duty imposed by s 9 of the WMA. The protocol should also have regard to audits conducted by the Natural Resources Commission.
Recommendation 3
That the DPIE implements all changes it has proposed to the Barwon-Darling Water Sharing Plan rules to ensure its consistency with the WMA, specifically: implementing individual daily extraction limits (IDELs) and total daily extraction limits (TDELs) (including trade limits on IDELs) raising A-class cease-to-pump thresholds based on up-to-date environmental water requirements to better protect low-flow water from extraction removing imminent flow provisions to prevent extraction of low-flow water even when higher flows are anticipated introducing resumption of flow rules to protect the first flow of water after a dry (low or cease-to-flow) period from extraction establishing management provisions to protect upstream environmental water releases from being extracted when they reach the Barwon-Darling.
Recommendation 4
That the DPIE establishes a dedicated and adequately funded water sharing plan (WSP) implementation team to ensure all of the state’s WSP rules are implemented effectively.
Recommendation 5
That the DPIE publishes a list of all WSP rules that have not yet been implemented and develops and publishes timelines for implementing these rules.
Recommendation 6
That the DPIE prioritises and seeks to bring forward audits of any WSP that have not, to date, been audited under s 44 of the WMA.
Recommendation 7
That the NSW Government recommences funding of scientific audits that periodically monitor the environmental health of its rivers and river flows to provide independent assurance of the effectiveness of its water management policies.
Recommendation 8
That the DPIE publishes all stakeholder and community engagement plans concerning water management when they are complete.
Recommendation 9
That the DPIE tasks an appropriately qualified and experienced independent reviewer to conduct, on a recurrent basis, reviews of the steps taken to implement its “Water stakeholder and community engagement policy” and the policy’s effectiveness. The independent reviewer should have the function of making such recommendations as they think necessary to ensure that all water stakeholders have their interests heard in a fair, balanced and transparent way.
Recommendation 10
That the DPIE develops a model procedure concerning the conduct of meetings with external stakeholders in respect of water management issues that includes requirements to: make records of these meetings publish meeting details including attendees, organisations represented and meeting agendas, on the water area of the DPIE’s website at least monthly.
Recommendation 11
That the DPIE formalises communication, information-sharing and consultation protocols with officers performing the functions of the Environment, Energy and Science Group (formerly the Office of Environment and Heritage).
Recommendation 12
That the DPIE ensures that its staff are properly inducted and receive ongoing training regarding the responsibilities of public officers in respect of the classification and handling of confidential and sensitive information.
Recommendation 13
That the DPIE reviews its recruitment policies and procedures to ensure that they are consistent with the Government Sector Employment (General) Rules 2014 rules and best-practice guidance provided by the Public Service Commission. Particular attention should be given to ensuring that: job advertisements run for enough time to allow the market to be tested hiring managers undertake the Public Service Commission’s recruitment training more than one member of a selection panel participates in the cull of candidates, unless exceptional circumstances exist clear guidance is provided about the relevance of any independent reports assessing the suitability of candidates.
Recommendation 14
That the NSW Government guarantees the funding of the Natural Resources Access Regulator (NRAR), at least to a level equivalent to the recommendations of the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal of NSW, over the long term.
Recommendation 15
That the DPIE periodically publishes aggregated water account information on its website and makes individual-level data available to NRAR.
Published responses 3
Notes on this record
- The investigation page states that no corrupt conduct findings were made or sought.
Coverage
This publisher
- Reports on investigations made public before 2016 are not online: the ICAC keeps only a summary for each, and copies must be requested from the ICAC. Those records hold the ICAC's published summary; findings and recommendations are not extracted.
- The ICAC copyright statement reserves all rights (fair dealing aside). OPAX keeps short verbatim finding and recommendation passages with links to the original report.
- Findings are read from the summary chapter of each report PDF. Where a finding's particulars run past the cited page only the finding statement is kept, and reports whose layout could not be read confidently are marked not_extracted.
- Agency action plans and progress reports are listed as documents; their contents (implementation status for each recommendation) are not parsed.
- Report PDFs without a text layer (scanned images, for example Operation Scania) are not OCRed; their findings stay not_extracted.
- Many pre-2016 summaries give only the month a report was made public; those records carry no date and a note with the month, because the schema holds day-level dates only.