Community attitudes to corruption and the ICAC Report on the 2006 survey
- Report length
- 35 pages
Summary
The report's own summary: Executive summary, pages 5 to 7
Generated summary: written by an AI model from the report text and checked against the cited pages.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption surveyed 502 NSW residents in May and June 2006 to inform and monitor its prevention and education work.
The survey examined perceptions of corruption, attitudes to reporting it and knowledge of ICAC.
ICAC reported that 92% supported reporting corruption, but 68% expected people who reported it to suffer and only about a third knew where to report.
ICAC concluded that attitudes had largely remained stable since 2003 and cautioned that the survey could not establish actual corruption levels or how people would act.
In the body's own words
- Conclusion
In conclusion, the present survey indicated that community attitudes towards corruption and the ICAC have remained relatively stable in most respects since 2003.
- Finding
Only one-third of the sample believed they knew where to report corruption.
Findings and recommendations
Allegations are not findings. A commission's finding or opinion of corrupt conduct or misconduct is not a finding that a person is guilty of a criminal offence, and the commissions say so in their reports.
No findings or recommendations are reproduced in this record. This does not establish that the report contains none.
Published responses
Responses to this report have not been checked.
Notes on this record
- Corruption prevention and research reports make no findings about individuals; any recommendations are not extracted unless set out as numbered recommendations that could be read confidently.
Coverage
This publisher
- Reports on investigations made public before 2016 are not online: the ICAC keeps only a summary for each, and copies must be requested from the ICAC. Those records hold the ICAC's published summary; findings and recommendations are not extracted.
- The ICAC copyright statement reserves all rights (fair dealing aside). OPAX keeps short verbatim finding and recommendation passages with links to the original report.
- Findings are read from the summary chapter of each report PDF. Where a finding's particulars run past the cited page only the finding statement is kept, and reports whose layout could not be read confidently are marked not_extracted.
- Agency action plans and progress reports are listed as documents; their contents (implementation status for each recommendation) are not parsed.
- Report PDFs without a text layer (scanned images, for example Operation Scania) are not OCRed; their findings stay not_extracted.
- Many pre-2016 summaries give only the month a report was made public; those records carry no date and a note with the month, because the schema holds day-level dates only.