Bill
Early Years Quality Fund Special Account Bill 2013
passed, as at 2013-06-29. School Education, Early Childhood and Youth portfolio.
- Sponsor
- Not recorded
- Portfolio
- School Education, Early Childhood and Youth
Recorded stages
- introduced — 2013-05-30
- second reading — 2013-05-30
- second reading — 2013-06-25
- second reading — 2013-06-25
- third reading — 2013-06-25
- introduced — 2013-06-28
- second reading — 2013-06-28
- second reading — 2013-06-28
- second reading — 2013-06-28
- third reading — 2013-06-28
- passed — 2013-06-28
- royal assent — 2013-06-29
Divisions
- Ken O'Dowd I wish to speak on the Early Years Quality Fund Special Account Bill 2013, which I oppose in its entirety. This legislation seeks to establish a $300 million fund to provide wage increases to around 30 to 40 per cent, although this figure is not clear, of the long day care workforce and it only lasts for two years. As for what happens after two years, we guess it reverts back to where it is today. The centres will need to enter into enterprise bargaining agreements with staff and meet eligibility criteria. Given the limited pool of funds, it could be on a 'first in' basis, yet this is not even clear. After the two years workers will revert back to their previous wage. This would be history-making if this were the case. This bill is unbalanced. It is divisive, it is unfair and it will create a wage war. The bill has come around as a result of the union involved waging the Big Steps campaign, seeking to increase wages and conditions in the early childhood sector. The United Voice union—previously the Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union, or the LHMU—have been campaigning for an increase in childcare sector wages since 2008, with their requests for increases ranging between $7 and $10 an hour. They proposed that the government fund this increase, and they were actually originally looking for $1.4 billion a year—and indexed. The coalition have a number of serious concerns with this bill. We do not dispute that childcare educators are low paid. We know these workers are skilled and work long and hard hours. Any wage increase should come through the Fair Work Commission, the body that the government has established with the responsibility of determining appropriate and fair levels of remuneration. Yet the United Voice union has refused to lodge a wage claim with the Fair Work Commission. Can you believe this? They rely instead on a Labor government to just hand over money hand over fist. It is unheard of. This $300 million is nothing more than an act of — 2013-06-25, House of Representatives: affirmative, ayes 74, noes 70
- The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the main idea of the [bill](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5074). In parliamentary jargon, they voted to read the bill for a [second time](https://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html). the Senate will now discuss the bill in more detail. ### What is the bill's main idea? The [bill](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r5074) was introduced to establish the Early Years Quality Fund Special Account to: > *provide $300 million over two years to approved centre based long day care services in the form of grants to be used exclusively for the remuneration of employees and other employment-related costs and expenses.* Read more in the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1213a/13bd133). — 2013-06-28, Senate: affirmative, ayes 34, noes 29
- John Hogg The question now is that the remaining stages of the bill be agreed to and the bill be now passed. — 2013-06-28, Senate: affirmative, ayes 34, noes 29
Plain-language summary
No machine-written summary in this export.
Sources
frl act