Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2025-02-12.201.2) introduced by the Australian Greens party, which means they were not successful. The amendments related to a review of peacekeeping service status, nuclear test participants, definitions of warlike and non-warlike service and the National Service Act service. ### Amendment text **SHEET 3285** > *(1) Schedule 1, page 21 (after line 6), after item 66, insert:* > >> *66A After Part 6 of Chapter 11* >> >> *Insert:* >> >> *Part 6A — Review* >> >> *438A Review of meaning of warlike service* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be conducted into whether it is appropriate for the meaning of the expression warlike service in section 6 to include peacekeeping service, including in areas of high risk and local or regional instability.* >> >> *(2) The review must make provision for public consultation.* >> >> *(3) The review must start as soon as practicable after the commencement of this section.* >> >> *(4) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review within 6 months of the commencement of the review.* >> >> *(5) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minister.* **SHEET 3021** > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 5), omit the table item, substitute:* > > *(2) Page 268 (after line 14), after Schedule 6, insert:* > >> *Schedule 6A — Nuclear test participants* >> >> *Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests and British Commonwealth Occupation Force (Treatment) Act 2006* >> >> *1 Subparagraph 5(3A)(b)(iv)* >> >>> *Omit "; and".* >> >> *2 At the end of paragraph 5(3A)(b)* >> >>> *Add:* >>> >>> *; or (v) an officer or employee of a government body, or an authority, of South Australia acting in the course of the officer or employee's duties; and* > > *Statement pursuant to the order of the S
Senate, 2025-02-12. negative: ayes 16, noes 25.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2025-02-12.201.2) introduced by the Australian Greens party, which means they were not successful. The amendments related to a review of peacekeeping service status, nuclear test participants, definitions of warlike and non-warlike service and the National Service Act service. ### Amendment text **SHEET 3285** > *(1) Schedule 1, page 21 (after line 6), after item 66, insert:* > >> *66A After Part 6 of Chapter 11* >> >> *Insert:* >> >> *Part 6A — Review* >> >> *438A Review of meaning of warlike service* >> >> *(1) The Minister must cause an independent review to be conducted into whether it is appropriate for the meaning of the expression warlike service in section 6 to include peacekeeping service, including in areas of high risk and local or regional instability.* >> >> *(2) The review must make provision for public consultation.* >> >> *(3) The review must start as soon as practicable after the commencement of this section.* >> >> *(4) The persons who conduct the review must give the Minister a written report of the review within 6 months of the commencement of the review.* >> >> *(5) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after the report is given to the Minister.* **SHEET 3021** > *(1) Clause 2, page 2 (table item 5), omit the table item, substitute:* > > *(2) Page 268 (after line 14), after Schedule 6, insert:* > >> *Schedule 6A — Nuclear test participants* >> >> *Australian Participants in British Nuclear Tests and British Commonwealth Occupation Force (Treatment) Act 2006* >> >> *1 Subparagraph 5(3A)(b)(iv)* >> >>> *Omit "; and".* >> >> *2 At the end of paragraph 5(3A)(b)* >> >>> *Add:* >>> >>> *; or (v) an officer or employee of a government body, or an authority, of South Australia acting in the course of the officer or employee's duties; and* > > *Statement pursuant to the order of the S
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.