Division
The majority voted in favour an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-12.36.2) introduced by NSW Senator [Perin Davey](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/perin_davey) (Nationals), which means it succeeded and the text below will be added to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add “but the Senate,* > > *(a) notes that there remains concern about aspects of the operation of this bill and, in particular, the rigid nature of the Statement of Principles used in determining claims for liability for injuries, diseases and deaths made by veterans; and* > > *(b) calls on the Government to cause a review to be undertaken by the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee, and in consultation with relevant stakeholders, into:* > >> *(i) whether the Statement of Principles are fit for purpose in ensuring that every veteran receives just and timely support,* >> >> *(ii) the functions of the Repatriation Medical Authority, and* >> >> *(iii) whether further changes are needed to relevant legislation, policy, procedures or guidelines to improve outcomes for veterans with unique or unusual circumstances”.*
Senate, 2025-02-12. affirmative: ayes 40, noes 18.
Question
The majority voted in favour an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2025-02-12.36.2) introduced by NSW Senator [Perin Davey](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/perin_davey) (Nationals), which means it succeeded and the text below will be added to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be read a second time*" (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add “but the Senate,* > > *(a) notes that there remains concern about aspects of the operation of this bill and, in particular, the rigid nature of the Statement of Principles used in determining claims for liability for injuries, diseases and deaths made by veterans; and* > > *(b) calls on the Government to cause a review to be undertaken by the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee, and in consultation with relevant stakeholders, into:* > >> *(i) whether the Statement of Principles are fit for purpose in ensuring that every veteran receives just and timely support,* >> >> *(ii) the functions of the Repatriation Medical Authority, and* >> >> *(iii) whether further changes are needed to relevant legislation, policy, procedures or guidelines to improve outcomes for veterans with unique or unusual circumstances”.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.