Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2023-08-09.10.2): > *That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of [standing order 111](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Chamber_documents/Senate_chamber_documents/standingorders/b00/b20#standing-order_c20-111) not apply to the [Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7070), allowing it to be considered during this period of sittings.* This means that bill can be considered during the present sitting period. #### Rebellion Note that the two Jacqui Lambie Network senators voted differently, with Tasmanian Senator [Jacqui Lambie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/jacqui_lambie) voting "No" and Tasmanian Senator [Tammy Tyrrell](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/tammy_tyrrell) voting "Yes". ### Paragraphs (5) to (8), Standing Order 111 > *(5) Where a bill:* > >> *(a) is first introduced in the Senate by a minister in a period of sittings; or* >> >> *(b) is received from the House of Representatives and was introduced in that House in the same period of sittings; or* >> >> *(c) is received from the House of Representatives after the expiration of two-thirds of the total number of days of sitting of the Senate scheduled for that period of sittings,* >> >> *and a motion is moved for the second reading of the bill, debate on that motion shall be adjourned at the conclusion of the speech of the senator moving the motion and resumption of the debate shall be made an order of the day for the first day of sitting in the next period of sittings without any question being put.* > > *(6) Paragraph (5) does not apply to a bill introduced in the Senate or received from the House of Representatives within the first two-thirds of the total number of days of sitting of the Senate scheduled for the first period of sittings after

Senate, 2023-08-09. affirmative: ayes 28, noes 10.

Question

The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2023-08-09.10.2): > *That the provisions of paragraphs (5) to (8) of [standing order 111](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Chamber_documents/Senate_chamber_documents/standingorders/b00/b20#standing-order_c20-111) not apply to the [Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2023](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7070), allowing it to be considered during this period of sittings.* This means that bill can be considered during the present sitting period. #### Rebellion Note that the two Jacqui Lambie Network senators voted differently, with Tasmanian Senator [Jacqui Lambie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/jacqui_lambie) voting "No" and Tasmanian Senator [Tammy Tyrrell](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/tasmania/tammy_tyrrell) voting "Yes". ### Paragraphs (5) to (8), Standing Order 111 > *(5) Where a bill:* > >> *(a) is first introduced in the Senate by a minister in a period of sittings; or* >> >> *(b) is received from the House of Representatives and was introduced in that House in the same period of sittings; or* >> >> *(c) is received from the House of Representatives after the expiration of two-thirds of the total number of days of sitting of the Senate scheduled for that period of sittings,* >> >> *and a motion is moved for the second reading of the bill, debate on that motion shall be adjourned at the conclusion of the speech of the senator moving the motion and resumption of the debate shall be made an order of the day for the first day of sitting in the next period of sittings without any question being put.* > > *(6) Paragraph (5) does not apply to a bill introduced in the Senate or received from the House of Representatives within the first two-thirds of the total number of days of sitting of the Senate scheduled for the first period of sittings after

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.