Division
The majority voted against [amendments (1) to (5)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-06-20.173.1), introduced by NSW Senator [Andrew Bragg](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/andrew_bragg) (Liberal), which means they were not successful. The amendments would have removed the requirement that training must be delivered by a registered provider to be eligible for the bonus deduction (up to a maximum of $20,000). ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 4, item 1, page 39 (after line 21), after subsection 328-445(3), insert:* > >> *Limit on deductions relating to training provided by non-registered training providers* >> >> *(3A) Despite subsections (1) to (3), the total of your deductions under this section for an income year in relation to expenditure that is not covered by subsection (3B) cannot exceed $20,000.* >> >> *(3B) This subsection covers expenditure you incur for any of the training mentioned in section 328-450 provided by a particular provider if, at the time you incur the expenditure:* >> >>> *(a) the provider is a registered body of any of the following kinds:* >>> >>>> *(i) a registered higher education provider (within the meaning of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011);* >>>> >>>> *(ii) a NVR registered training organisation (within the meaning of the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011);* >>>> >>>> *(iii) a registered education and training organisation (within the meaning of the Education and Training Reform Act 2006 (Vic.));* >>>> >>>> *(iv) a registered training provider (within the meaning of the Vocational Education and Training Act 1996 (WA)); and* >>> >>> *(b) if the provider is a registered body of a kind mentioned in paragraph (a)(ii), (iii) or (iv)—the training is within the provider's scope of registration for that kind of registered body.* > > *(2) Schedule 4, item 1, page 40 (line 10), omit "(1)".* > > *(3) Schedule 4, item 1, page 40 (lines 15 to 22), omit paragra
Senate, 2023-06-20. negative: ayes 29, noes 30.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments (1) to (5)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-06-20.173.1), introduced by NSW Senator [Andrew Bragg](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/andrew_bragg) (Liberal), which means they were not successful. The amendments would have removed the requirement that training must be delivered by a registered provider to be eligible for the bonus deduction (up to a maximum of $20,000). ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 4, item 1, page 39 (after line 21), after subsection 328-445(3), insert:* > >> *Limit on deductions relating to training provided by non-registered training providers* >> >> *(3A) Despite subsections (1) to (3), the total of your deductions under this section for an income year in relation to expenditure that is not covered by subsection (3B) cannot exceed $20,000.* >> >> *(3B) This subsection covers expenditure you incur for any of the training mentioned in section 328-450 provided by a particular provider if, at the time you incur the expenditure:* >> >>> *(a) the provider is a registered body of any of the following kinds:* >>> >>>> *(i) a registered higher education provider (within the meaning of the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011);* >>>> >>>> *(ii) a NVR registered training organisation (within the meaning of the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011);* >>>> >>>> *(iii) a registered education and training organisation (within the meaning of the Education and Training Reform Act 2006 (Vic.));* >>>> >>>> *(iv) a registered training provider (within the meaning of the Vocational Education and Training Act 1996 (WA)); and* >>> >>> *(b) if the provider is a registered body of a kind mentioned in paragraph (a)(ii), (iii) or (iv)—the training is within the provider's scope of registration for that kind of registered body.* > > *(2) Schedule 4, item 1, page 40 (line 10), omit "(1)".* > > *(3) Schedule 4, item 1, page 40 (lines 15 to 22), omit paragra
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.