Division
The majority voted against [amendment requests (1) to (5)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-03-06.25.1) on sheet 1819 moved by Queensland Senator [Larissa Waters](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/larissa_waters) (Greens), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 2, page 4 (line 13), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 38, page 13 (line 6), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 19), omit "90", substitute "120".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 31), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 66, page 26 (line 12), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > ———— > > *Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (3), (4) and (5)* > >> *Amendments (3), (4) and (5) are framed as requests because they amend the bill to increase the maximum number of days for which paid parental leave can be paid in relation to a child from 100 days to 130 days.* >> >> *As this will increase the total amount of paid parental leave that can be paid, the amendments will increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010.* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *Amendments (1) and (2) are consequential to amendments (3), (4) and (5).* > > *Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (3), (4) and (5)* > >> *If the effect of the amendments is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendments be moved as requests.* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *These amendments are consequential on the requests. It is the practice of the Senate that an amendment that is consequential on an amendment framed as a request may also be framed as a request.*
Senate, 2023-03-06. negative: ayes 12, noes 27.
Question
The majority voted against [amendment requests (1) to (5)](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2023-03-06.25.1) on sheet 1819 moved by Queensland Senator [Larissa Waters](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/larissa_waters) (Greens), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 2, page 4 (line 13), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(2) Schedule 1, item 38, page 13 (line 6), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 19), omit "90", substitute "120".* > > *(4) Schedule 1, item 66, page 25 (line 31), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > *(5) Schedule 1, item 66, page 26 (line 12), omit "100", substitute "130".* > > ———— > > *Statement pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (3), (4) and (5)* > >> *Amendments (3), (4) and (5) are framed as requests because they amend the bill to increase the maximum number of days for which paid parental leave can be paid in relation to a child from 100 days to 130 days.* >> >> *As this will increase the total amount of paid parental leave that can be paid, the amendments will increase the amount of expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010.* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *Amendments (1) and (2) are consequential to amendments (3), (4) and (5).* > > *Statement by the Clerk of the Senate pursuant to the order of the Senate of 26 June 2000* > > *Amendments (3), (4) and (5)* > >> *If the effect of the amendments is to increase expenditure under the standing appropriation in section 307 of the Paid Parental Leave Act 2010 then it is in accordance with the precedents of the Senate that the amendments be moved as requests.* > > *Amendments (1) and (2)* > >> *These amendments are consequential on the requests. It is the practice of the Senate that an amendment that is consequential on an amendment framed as a request may also be framed as a request.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.