Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted against a [second reading amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-11-24.191.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Gerard Rennick](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/gerard_rennick) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What are second reading amendments? Second reading amendments like these don't make legal changes themselves, but instead represent the will of the Senate. They add words to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be [read a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. ### Motion text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that with this policy the Government has failed to:* > >> *(i) consider the need to dispose of EV car batteries in an environmentally safe manner,* >> >> *(ii) address the hazardous by-products of redundant EV car batteries and ensure that toxic substances do not leach into the environment,* >> >> *(iii) consider the costs of recycling EV car batteries,* >> >> *(iv) introduce regulatory standards or criteria for recycled EV car batteries to be re-sold to the public,* > > *(b) calls on the Government to outline a plan for EV battery recycling and consider other proposals to cover the costs of recycling and disposal of EV car batteries*

Senate, 2022-11-24. negative: ayes 24, noes 27.

Question

The majority voted against a [second reading amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-11-24.191.1) introduced by Queensland Senator [Gerard Rennick](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/queensland/gerard_rennick) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What are second reading amendments? Second reading amendments like these don't make legal changes themselves, but instead represent the will of the Senate. They add words to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be [read a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. ### Motion text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that with this policy the Government has failed to:* > >> *(i) consider the need to dispose of EV car batteries in an environmentally safe manner,* >> >> *(ii) address the hazardous by-products of redundant EV car batteries and ensure that toxic substances do not leach into the environment,* >> >> *(iii) consider the costs of recycling EV car batteries,* >> >> *(iv) introduce regulatory standards or criteria for recycled EV car batteries to be re-sold to the public,* > > *(b) calls on the Government to outline a plan for EV battery recycling and consider other proposals to cover the costs of recycling and disposal of EV car batteries*

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.