Division
The majority voted against a [second reading amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-11-24.69.3) introduced by West Australian Senator [Dean Smith](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/dean_smith) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What are second reading amendments? Second reading amendments like these don't make legal changes themselves, but instead represent the will of the Senate. They add words to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be [read a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. ### Motion text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that:* > >> *(i) with this policy the Government has failed to:* >> >>> *(A) establish clear criteria and metrics of success for the policy,* >>> >>> *(B) ensure the expenditure is temporary, proportionate, and linked to tangible productivity gains,* >>> >>> *(C) quantify any benefit of the policy to electric vehicle uptake, to emissions reduction, or the budget bottom line,* >>> >>> *(D) tangibly address the biggest constraint on electric vehicle uptake, which is supply and infrastructure, and* >>> >>> *(E) consult with business and civil society on policy design,* >> >> *(ii) the legislation does not address the core supply issues of electric vehicles, and will not substantially close the consequent cost gap between electric vehicles and non-electric vehicles,* >> >> *(iii) the Coalition supports increased uptake of low and zero emissions vehicles and the Coalition government's focus was on enabling consumer choice when it comes to new vehicle and fuel technologies, and* >> >> *(iv) the Coalition is focused on partnering with industry to support the uptake of new vehicle technologies and creating the necessary enabling environment to support uptake, which includes helpin
Senate, 2022-11-24. negative: ayes 23, noes 29.
Question
The majority voted against a [second reading amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2022-11-24.69.3) introduced by West Australian Senator [Dean Smith](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/wa/dean_smith) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### What are second reading amendments? Second reading amendments like these don't make legal changes themselves, but instead represent the will of the Senate. They add words to the usual second reading motion, which is "*that the bill be [read a second time](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/)*", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. ### Motion text > *At the end of the motion, add ", but the Senate:* > > *(a) notes that:* > >> *(i) with this policy the Government has failed to:* >> >>> *(A) establish clear criteria and metrics of success for the policy,* >>> >>> *(B) ensure the expenditure is temporary, proportionate, and linked to tangible productivity gains,* >>> >>> *(C) quantify any benefit of the policy to electric vehicle uptake, to emissions reduction, or the budget bottom line,* >>> >>> *(D) tangibly address the biggest constraint on electric vehicle uptake, which is supply and infrastructure, and* >>> >>> *(E) consult with business and civil society on policy design,* >> >> *(ii) the legislation does not address the core supply issues of electric vehicles, and will not substantially close the consequent cost gap between electric vehicles and non-electric vehicles,* >> >> *(iii) the Coalition supports increased uptake of low and zero emissions vehicles and the Coalition government's focus was on enabling consumer choice when it comes to new vehicle and fuel technologies, and* >> >> *(iv) the Coalition is focused on partnering with industry to support the uptake of new vehicle technologies and creating the necessary enabling environment to support uptake, which includes helpin
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.