Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2021-03-18.44.5) that: > *[division 2](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr6653_first-reps%2F0007;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr6653_first-reps%2F0000%22;rec=0#140cd707c70e41a587b2a65f735567ea) in item 1 of schedule 7 stand as printed.* In other words, they voted to keep that division unchanged. ### What does Division 2 do? Division 2 includes proposed clauses 45 to 48. According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2021a/21bd053): > *Proposed clause 45 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 to the Bill provides that employers, employees or employee organisations can apply for the FWC to make a determination to vary an enterprise agreement made before commencement of the reforms to resolve any uncertainty regarding the interaction of the agreement with the proposed definition of casual employee and proposed casual conversion process* > > *Proposed clause 46 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 provides: > > * *existing employees that would have met the proposed statutory definition of casual employment when engaged (or when given an offer of employment) will be considered casual employees both at the commencement of the Bill and retrospectively (this does not apply to employees who were the subject of a binding court decision or converted their status prior to commencement)* > > * *employees that are retrospectively deemed casual employees, who could have otherwise made a claim for accrued entitlements, will not be able to do so* > > *Proposed clause 47 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 provides a six month transitional period where employers musts assess existing casual employees against conversion eligibility criteria (this includes employees designated as ‘casual’ but who may not meet the proposed statutory de
Senate, 2021-03-18. affirmative: ayes 33, noes 31.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2021-03-18.44.5) that: > *[division 2](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr6653_first-reps%2F0007;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr6653_first-reps%2F0000%22;rec=0#140cd707c70e41a587b2a65f735567ea) in item 1 of schedule 7 stand as printed.* In other words, they voted to keep that division unchanged. ### What does Division 2 do? Division 2 includes proposed clauses 45 to 48. According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd2021a/21bd053): > *Proposed clause 45 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 to the Bill provides that employers, employees or employee organisations can apply for the FWC to make a determination to vary an enterprise agreement made before commencement of the reforms to resolve any uncertainty regarding the interaction of the agreement with the proposed definition of casual employee and proposed casual conversion process* > > *Proposed clause 46 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 provides: > > * *existing employees that would have met the proposed statutory definition of casual employment when engaged (or when given an offer of employment) will be considered casual employees both at the commencement of the Bill and retrospectively (this does not apply to employees who were the subject of a binding court decision or converted their status prior to commencement)* > > * *employees that are retrospectively deemed casual employees, who could have otherwise made a claim for accrued entitlements, will not be able to do so* > > *Proposed clause 47 of Schedule 1 to the Act, at item 1 of Schedule 7 provides a six month transitional period where employers musts assess existing casual employees against conversion eligibility criteria (this includes employees designated as ‘casual’ but who may not meet the proposed statutory de
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.