Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2020-12-08.15.2): > *that the [Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query%3DId%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr6608%22) be included with the other bills exempt from the cut-off order.* In other words, they wanted to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - so that they can consider the Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 during this sitting period.
Senate, 2020-12-08. affirmative: ayes 32, noes 29.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2020-12-08.15.2): > *that the [Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query%3DId%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr6608%22) be included with the other bills exempt from the cut-off order.* In other words, they wanted to suspend the usual procedural rules - known as [standing orders](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/parliament-at-work/standing-orders/) - so that they can consider the Social Security (Administration) Amendment (Continuation of Cashless Welfare) Bill 2020 during this sitting period.
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.