Division
The majority voted in favour of [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2019-10-16.35.1) introduced by South Australian [Rex Patrick](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/rex_patrick) (Centre Alliance), which means they passed. In explaining the Labor Party's support for the two amendments, numbered (5) and (7), NSW Senator [Jenny McAllister](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/jenny_mcallister) (Labor) [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2019-10-16.36.1): > *As I indicated, Labor will support these amendments. In relation to amendment (5), we support the provision of additional information to taxpayers as outlined in that amendment. In relation to amendment (7), we do support consultation with the Inspector-General of Taxation on all legislative instruments under this bill. We understand that this is something that occurs already, but we think it is important that it is placed in the primary legislation.* ### Amendments text > *(5) Schedule 5, item 2, page 16 (after line 16), after paragraph 355-72(3)(b) in Schedule 1, insert:* > >> *(ba) explain:* >> >>> *(i) why the primary entity is included in a class of entities declared under subsection (5); and* >>> >>> *(ii) the steps (if any) the primary entity may take to no longer be included in that class before the disclosure occurs; and* > > *(7) Schedule 5, item 2, page 17 (after line 16), after subsection 355-72(5) in Schedule 1, insert:* > >> *(5A) Before making an instrument under subsection (5), the Minister must:* >> >>> *(a) consult the Inspector-General of Taxation; and* >>> >>> *(b) consider any submissions made by the Inspector-General of Taxation because of that consultation.*
Senate, 2019-10-16. affirmative: ayes 33, noes 28.
Question
The majority voted in favour of [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2019-10-16.35.1) introduced by South Australian [Rex Patrick](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/sa/rex_patrick) (Centre Alliance), which means they passed. In explaining the Labor Party's support for the two amendments, numbered (5) and (7), NSW Senator [Jenny McAllister](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/jenny_mcallister) (Labor) [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2019-10-16.36.1): > *As I indicated, Labor will support these amendments. In relation to amendment (5), we support the provision of additional information to taxpayers as outlined in that amendment. In relation to amendment (7), we do support consultation with the Inspector-General of Taxation on all legislative instruments under this bill. We understand that this is something that occurs already, but we think it is important that it is placed in the primary legislation.* ### Amendments text > *(5) Schedule 5, item 2, page 16 (after line 16), after paragraph 355-72(3)(b) in Schedule 1, insert:* > >> *(ba) explain:* >> >>> *(i) why the primary entity is included in a class of entities declared under subsection (5); and* >>> >>> *(ii) the steps (if any) the primary entity may take to no longer be included in that class before the disclosure occurs; and* > > *(7) Schedule 5, item 2, page 17 (after line 16), after subsection 355-72(5) in Schedule 1, insert:* > >> *(5A) Before making an instrument under subsection (5), the Minister must:* >> >>> *(a) consult the Inspector-General of Taxation; and* >>> >>> *(b) consider any submissions made by the Inspector-General of Taxation because of that consultation.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.