Division
The majority voted against amendments (1) to (4) on [sheet 8524](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr5871_amend_ecbeadcd-43d8-47a6-9100-0c8698883cc4%22;rec=0), which were introduced by Centre Alliance. ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 4, page 3 (after line 14), after the definition of accountable authority, insert:* > >> **Agreement** *means the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, done at Santiago, Chile on 8 March 2018, as amended and in force for Australia from time to time.* >> >> *Note 1: The Agreement could in 2018 be viewed in the Australian Treaties Library on the AustLII website (http://www.austlii.edu.au).* >> >> *Note 2: Under Article 1 of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (the Santiago Agreement), most of the provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (the Auckland Agreement), done at Auckland on 4 February 2016, are incorporated, by reference, into and made part of the Santiago Agreement. This means, for example, that Chapters 1 and 3 of the Auckland Agreement are, because of that Article, Chapters 1 and 3 of the Santiago Agreement.* > > *(2) Clause 4, page 4 (after line 2), after the definition of official, insert:* > >> **Party** *has the meaning given by Article 1of Chapter 1 of the Agreement.* > > *(3) Clause 21, page 16 (after line 16), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *This Act ceases to have effect on 1 January 2020 unless certain bilateral side letters to the Agreement are exchanged and come into force for Australia before that day.* > > *(4) Page 17 (after line 17), at the end of Part 5, add:* > >> *26 Cessation of effect of Act* >> >> *7 This Act ceases to have effect on 1 January 2020 unless all of the following come into force for Australia before that day:* >> >>> *(a) bilateral side letters exchanged between Australia and each other Party agreeing
Senate, 2018-10-18. negative: ayes 14, noes 42.
Question
The majority voted against amendments (1) to (4) on [sheet 8524](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Famend%2Fr5871_amend_ecbeadcd-43d8-47a6-9100-0c8698883cc4%22;rec=0), which were introduced by Centre Alliance. ### Amendment text > *(1) Clause 4, page 3 (after line 14), after the definition of accountable authority, insert:* > >> **Agreement** *means the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, done at Santiago, Chile on 8 March 2018, as amended and in force for Australia from time to time.* >> >> *Note 1: The Agreement could in 2018 be viewed in the Australian Treaties Library on the AustLII website (http://www.austlii.edu.au).* >> >> *Note 2: Under Article 1 of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (the Santiago Agreement), most of the provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (the Auckland Agreement), done at Auckland on 4 February 2016, are incorporated, by reference, into and made part of the Santiago Agreement. This means, for example, that Chapters 1 and 3 of the Auckland Agreement are, because of that Article, Chapters 1 and 3 of the Santiago Agreement.* > > *(2) Clause 4, page 4 (after line 2), after the definition of official, insert:* > >> **Party** *has the meaning given by Article 1of Chapter 1 of the Agreement.* > > *(3) Clause 21, page 16 (after line 16), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *This Act ceases to have effect on 1 January 2020 unless certain bilateral side letters to the Agreement are exchanged and come into force for Australia before that day.* > > *(4) Page 17 (after line 17), at the end of Part 5, add:* > >> *26 Cessation of effect of Act* >> >> *7 This Act ceases to have effect on 1 January 2020 unless all of the following come into force for Australia before that day:* >> >>> *(a) bilateral side letters exchanged between Australia and each other Party agreeing
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.