Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-06-19.287.1) to the usual second reading motion, which is that the bill be read a second time (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the original motion will remain unchanged. ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add "but the Senate notes that the bill:* > > *(a) significantly reduces the progressive nature of the income tax system;* > > *(b) does not target low income earners, who are most affected by bracket creep;* > > *(c) does not improve the living standards of those who are unable to find work;* > > *(d) will not help reduce inequality; and* > > *(e) locks in tax cuts that:* > >> *(i) are premised on economic forecasts that have a high degree of uncertainty; and* >> >> *(ii) in 7 years' time, will constrain a future government's capacity to provide public services and to invest in public infrastructure".*

Senate, 2018-06-20. negative: ayes 30, noes 37.

Question

The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-06-19.287.1) to the usual second reading motion, which is that the bill be read a second time (parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill). This means the original motion will remain unchanged. ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add "but the Senate notes that the bill:* > > *(a) significantly reduces the progressive nature of the income tax system;* > > *(b) does not target low income earners, who are most affected by bracket creep;* > > *(c) does not improve the living standards of those who are unable to find work;* > > *(d) will not help reduce inequality; and* > > *(e) locks in tax cuts that:* > >> *(i) are premised on economic forecasts that have a high degree of uncertainty; and* >> >> *(ii) in 7 years' time, will constrain a future government's capacity to provide public services and to invest in public infrastructure".*

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.