Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-02-14.5.1) introduced by Senator [David Leyonhjelm](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/david_leyonhjelm), which means it was unsuccessful. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (after line 23), after the definition of on-demand program service, insert:* >> *outdoor public place means an outdoor place to which the public, or a section of the public, ordinarily has access, whether or not by payment or by invitation (including, for example, the open air areas of an outdoor concert or sportsground).* > *(2) Schedule 1, item 18, page 8 (after line 23), after subsection 9B(6), insert:* >> *(7) For the purposes of this section, an intimate image does not include a drawing, painting or sketch (whether still or moving).* >> *(8) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4), an intimate image does not include images of a person in an outdoor public place.* ### What does the bill do? The bill [was introduced to](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1113): * *prohibit the posting of, or threatening to post, an intimate image without consent on a social media service, relevant electronic service or a designated internet service;* * *establish a complaints and objections system to be administered by the eSafety Commissioner;* * *provide the commissioner with powers to issue removal notices or remedial directions;* * *establish a civil penalty regime to be administered by the commissioner; and* * *enable the commissioner to seek a civil penalty order from a relevant court, issue an infringement notice, obtain an injunction or enforce an undertaking, or issue a formal warning for contraventions of the civil penalty provisions* Note that the bill *does not* criminalise sharing intimate images without consent. The prohibition it creates is a [civil matter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_(common_law)),
Senate, 2018-02-14. negative: ayes 5, noes 44.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2018-02-14.5.1) introduced by Senator [David Leyonhjelm](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/nsw/david_leyonhjelm), which means it was unsuccessful. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 4, page 4 (after line 23), after the definition of on-demand program service, insert:* >> *outdoor public place means an outdoor place to which the public, or a section of the public, ordinarily has access, whether or not by payment or by invitation (including, for example, the open air areas of an outdoor concert or sportsground).* > *(2) Schedule 1, item 18, page 8 (after line 23), after subsection 9B(6), insert:* >> *(7) For the purposes of this section, an intimate image does not include a drawing, painting or sketch (whether still or moving).* >> *(8) For the purposes of subsections (3) and (4), an intimate image does not include images of a person in an outdoor public place.* ### What does the bill do? The bill [was introduced to](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/s1113): * *prohibit the posting of, or threatening to post, an intimate image without consent on a social media service, relevant electronic service or a designated internet service;* * *establish a complaints and objections system to be administered by the eSafety Commissioner;* * *provide the commissioner with powers to issue removal notices or remedial directions;* * *establish a civil penalty regime to be administered by the commissioner; and* * *enable the commissioner to seek a civil penalty order from a relevant court, issue an infringement notice, obtain an injunction or enforce an undertaking, or issue a formal warning for contraventions of the civil penalty provisions* Note that the bill *does not* criminalise sharing intimate images without consent. The prohibition it creates is a [civil matter](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_law_(common_law)),
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.