Division
The majority voted in favour of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2017-09-07.18.1) introduced by ACT Senator [Katy Gallagher](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/katy_gallagher) (Labor), which means it passed and will be added to the [original motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2017-09-07.17.2). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add, “but in respect of the [Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22legislation/billhome/r5929%22), the bill be referred immediately to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee report by 16 October 2017.”*
Senate, 2017-09-07. affirmative: ayes 33, noes 24.
Question
The majority voted in favour of an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?gid=2017-09-07.18.1) introduced by ACT Senator [Katy Gallagher](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/senate/act/katy_gallagher) (Labor), which means it passed and will be added to the [original motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/senate/?id=2017-09-07.17.2). ### Amendment text > *At the end of the motion, add, “but in respect of the [Competition and Consumer Amendment (Abolition of Limited Merits Review) Bill 2017](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22legislation/billhome/r5929%22), the bill be referred immediately to the Environment and Communications Legislation Committee report by 16 October 2017.”*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.