Division
Pauline Hanson by leave—I move Pauline Hanson's One Nation amendments (1) and (2) on sheet 8093: (1) Schedule 1, item 26, page 11 (after line 13), at the end of paragraph 8A(5) (c), add: (vi) a service relating to betting on the outcome of a lottery; (2) Schedule 1, page 13 (after line 15), after item 27, insert: 27A At the end of subsection 8D(2) Add: ; or (c) betting on the outcome of a lottery. My amendments are about a service related to betting on the outcome of a lottery. We have a foreign investor in Australia by the name of Lottoland, who bought a licence in the Northern Territory for $550,000. They are actually allowing people to bet on the outcome of a lottery anywhere in the world. They pay no tax. They are here in Australia. They do not employ a lot of people; they employ about six people. They are providing a service that is detrimental to 4½ thousand newsagents around this country who rely on lottery tickets being sold and who are struggling. So here we have a foreign company in Australia, possibly taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions of dollars, out of the country in unpaid taxes. I also raised this in light of the government moving a bill in this house to address multinationals not paying their taxes in Australia. I think this has been on the table since almost 20 years ago when, I can remember, I raised the topic of multinationals not paying their taxes in Australia. This would be a good reason for the government to support my amendment to shut down one foreign multinational company working here in Australia and to stop the demise of 4½ thousand newsagents who are losing business because of this. If they are fair dinkum about clamping down on multinationals in Australia—in this case not employing a lot of Australians—taking money out of the country by not paying taxes here, then I expect the government and the opposition to support my amendments. Mitch Fifield I thank Senator Hanson and her office for taking the government throug
Senate, 2017-03-21. negative: ayes 18, noes 30.
Question
Pauline Hanson by leave—I move Pauline Hanson's One Nation amendments (1) and (2) on sheet 8093: (1) Schedule 1, item 26, page 11 (after line 13), at the end of paragraph 8A(5) (c), add: (vi) a service relating to betting on the outcome of a lottery; (2) Schedule 1, page 13 (after line 15), after item 27, insert: 27A At the end of subsection 8D(2) Add: ; or (c) betting on the outcome of a lottery. My amendments are about a service related to betting on the outcome of a lottery. We have a foreign investor in Australia by the name of Lottoland, who bought a licence in the Northern Territory for $550,000. They are actually allowing people to bet on the outcome of a lottery anywhere in the world. They pay no tax. They are here in Australia. They do not employ a lot of people; they employ about six people. They are providing a service that is detrimental to 4½ thousand newsagents around this country who rely on lottery tickets being sold and who are struggling. So here we have a foreign company in Australia, possibly taking hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions of dollars, out of the country in unpaid taxes. I also raised this in light of the government moving a bill in this house to address multinationals not paying their taxes in Australia. I think this has been on the table since almost 20 years ago when, I can remember, I raised the topic of multinationals not paying their taxes in Australia. This would be a good reason for the government to support my amendment to shut down one foreign multinational company working here in Australia and to stop the demise of 4½ thousand newsagents who are losing business because of this. If they are fair dinkum about clamping down on multinationals in Australia—in this case not employing a lot of Australians—taking money out of the country by not paying taxes here, then I expect the government and the opposition to support my amendments. Mitch Fifield I thank Senator Hanson and her office for taking the government throug
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.