Division
Kim Carr I would like to indicate to the committee that it is my intention to seek leave to move six separate blocks of amendments relating to the nature of visas, increased penalties, business numbers, whistleblower protections, reporting obligations, coercion and criminal offences and civil penalties in relation to visa holders. So I indicate that these are separate measures and I believe that we can vote on these as blocks. I seek leave, firstly, to move amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55). Nigel Scullion Would it be possible for Senator Carr to give us an update on the amendments he intends to deal with? Kim Carr Yes, I will repeat that. They are amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55). Leave granted. by leave—I move opposition amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55): (5) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 11), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (6) Schedule 1, item 1 page 3 (lines 14 and 15), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (7) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 20), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (8) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 23), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (10) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (after line 29), after the definition of _benefit_ in subsection (4), insert: _ migration outcome_ _-related event_ has the meaning given by section 245AQ. (11) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (lines 30 and 31), omit the definition of sponsorship-related event in subsection (4). (12) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 8), omit "sponsored visas", substitute "work visas". (13) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (after line 24), after the definition of _executive officer_ in secti
Senate, 2015-11-24. negative: ayes 28, noes 33.
Question
Kim Carr I would like to indicate to the committee that it is my intention to seek leave to move six separate blocks of amendments relating to the nature of visas, increased penalties, business numbers, whistleblower protections, reporting obligations, coercion and criminal offences and civil penalties in relation to visa holders. So I indicate that these are separate measures and I believe that we can vote on these as blocks. I seek leave, firstly, to move amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55). Nigel Scullion Would it be possible for Senator Carr to give us an update on the amendments he intends to deal with? Kim Carr Yes, I will repeat that. They are amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55). Leave granted. by leave—I move opposition amendments (5) to (8), (10) to (18), (22), (23), (25), (27) to (30), (32) to (37), (39) to (44) and (47) to (55): (5) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 11), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (6) Schedule 1, item 1 page 3 (lines 14 and 15), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (7) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 20), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (8) Schedule 1, item 1, page 3 (line 23), omit "sponsorship-related event", substitute "migration outcome-related event". (10) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (after line 29), after the definition of _benefit_ in subsection (4), insert: _ migration outcome_ _-related event_ has the meaning given by section 245AQ. (11) Schedule 1, item 3, page 3 (lines 30 and 31), omit the definition of sponsorship-related event in subsection (4). (12) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (line 8), omit "sponsored visas", substitute "work visas". (13) Schedule 1, item 6, page 4 (after line 24), after the definition of _executive officer_ in secti
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.