Division
The majority voted against an amendment "_that [subclause 13(2)](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0002;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0001%22;rec=0#55ff3017c0ca4cdc94bb1be3fdef0536) and [subclauses 34(4) to (6)](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0003;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0001%22;rec=0#226af90b17bc4090be40f9a7b181f776) stand as printed_", which means that the majority disagreed with these subclauses and did not want them to remain as they were. This motion was put following an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1) put forward by Labor Senator [Kim Carr](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate) to oppose those subclauses. Senator Carr explained that the purpose of the amendments is to "save the [Education Investment Fund](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund)" ('EIF'),(Read Senator Carr's full explanation of the amendment and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2014-07-17.70.1), after 1.35 pm. ) which the bill in its current form will abolish after its funds are redirected to the newly created Asset Recycling Fund. The EIF was established by the [Nation-building Funds Act 2008](http://www.finance.gov.au/investment-funds/nation-building-funds/act/) to replace the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF). It provides funding to projects that "create or develop significant infrastructure in higher education, research and vocational education and training institutions".(Read more about the EIF [here](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund). ) _Background to the bills_ The [Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation
Senate, 2014-07-17. negative: ayes 31, noes 36.
Question
The majority voted against an amendment "_that [subclause 13(2)](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0002;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0001%22;rec=0#55ff3017c0ca4cdc94bb1be3fdef0536) and [subclauses 34(4) to (6)](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;db=LEGISLATION;id=legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0003;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbills%2Fr5255_first-reps%2F0001%22;rec=0#226af90b17bc4090be40f9a7b181f776) stand as printed_", which means that the majority disagreed with these subclauses and did not want them to remain as they were. This motion was put following an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1) put forward by Labor Senator [Kim Carr](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate) to oppose those subclauses. Senator Carr explained that the purpose of the amendments is to "save the [Education Investment Fund](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund)" ('EIF'),(Read Senator Carr's full explanation of the amendment and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2014-07-17.70.1), after 1.35 pm. ) which the bill in its current form will abolish after its funds are redirected to the newly created Asset Recycling Fund. The EIF was established by the [Nation-building Funds Act 2008](http://www.finance.gov.au/investment-funds/nation-building-funds/act/) to replace the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF). It provides funding to projects that "create or develop significant infrastructure in higher education, research and vocational education and training institutions".(Read more about the EIF [here](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund). ) _Background to the bills_ The [Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.