Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.80.3) "_that [amendments](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1) (1) to (5) and (14) to (16) be agreed to_",(Read the amendments [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1). ) which means that they were successful. The amendments were introduced by Labor Senator [Kim Carr](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate). Senator Carr explained that the purpose of the amendments is to "save the [Education Investment Fund](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund)" ('EIF'),(Read Senator Carr's full explanation of the amendment and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2014-07-17.70.1), after 1.35 pm. ) which the bill in its current form will abolish after its funds are redirected to the newly created Asset Recycling Fund. The EIF was established by the [Nation-building Funds Act 2008](http://www.finance.gov.au/investment-funds/nation-building-funds/act/) to replace the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF). It provides funding to projects that "create or develop significant infrastructure in higher education, research and vocational education and training institutions".(Read more about the EIF [here](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund). ) _Background to the bills_ The [Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5255%22) and the related [Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5256%22) were introduced to create the Asset Recycling Fund ('ARF'). The ARF is the fund from which grants to states and territories will be sourced under the Asset Recycling Initiative ('ARI'), which was developed to assist states to privat
Senate, 2014-07-17. affirmative: ayes 35, noes 32.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.80.3) "_that [amendments](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1) (1) to (5) and (14) to (16) be agreed to_",(Read the amendments [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-17.76.1). ) which means that they were successful. The amendments were introduced by Labor Senator [Kim Carr](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Kim_Carr&mpc=Senate&house=senate). Senator Carr explained that the purpose of the amendments is to "save the [Education Investment Fund](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund)" ('EIF'),(Read Senator Carr's full explanation of the amendment and the related debate [here](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2014-07-17.70.1), after 1.35 pm. ) which the bill in its current form will abolish after its funds are redirected to the newly created Asset Recycling Fund. The EIF was established by the [Nation-building Funds Act 2008](http://www.finance.gov.au/investment-funds/nation-building-funds/act/) to replace the Higher Education Endowment Fund (HEEF). It provides funding to projects that "create or develop significant infrastructure in higher education, research and vocational education and training institutions".(Read more about the EIF [here](https://www.education.gov.au/education-investment-fund). ) _Background to the bills_ The [Asset Recycling Fund Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5255%22) and the related [Asset Recycling Fund (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014](http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fr5256%22) were introduced to create the Asset Recycling Fund ('ARF'). The ARF is the fund from which grants to states and territories will be sourced under the Asset Recycling Initiative ('ARI'), which was developed to assist states to privat
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.