Division
This division relates to the Policy _[For a carbon price](/policies/3)_. The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-09.20.14) moved by Senator [Lisa Singh](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Lisa_Singh&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-07.166.1) to the original motion "That these bills be now read a [second time](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html)" and was the following: _At the end of the motion, add:_ _but the Senate notes_ _(a) the scientific and expert consensus regarding Climate Change;_ _(b) that in its first year, the Clean Energy Future Package:_ _(i) drove a 7% reduction in carbon pollution from electricity generation in the National Electricity Market;_ _(ii) saw renewable energy increase its share of the National Electricity Market by 25%;_ _(iii) delivered the household assistance package to compensate families and individuals for any impact of carbon pricing; and_ _(iv) supported continued economic growth, with over 160,000 jobs created in 2012-13 across the economy, including clean energy jobs;_ _(c) that since the 2013 election Australia's international reputation on climate change action has been damaged by becoming the first nation to move backwards on climate change while the rest of the world, including China and the US, is moving forward; and_ _(d) the need for the Government to pass an [Emissions Trading Scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissions_Trading_Scheme) to place a cap on carbon pollution and drive a clean energy future for Australia._ Background to the bills The [Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 (No. 2)](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5292) and related bills were introduced to remove the [carbon pricing mechanism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
Senate, 2014-07-09. negative: ayes 34, noes 41.
Question
This division relates to the Policy _[For a carbon price](/policies/3)_. The majority voted against a [motion](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-09.20.14) moved by Senator [Lisa Singh](http://publicwhip-rails.openaustraliafoundation.org.au/mp.php?mpn=Lisa_Singh&mpc=Senate&house=senate), which means that it was unsuccessful. The motion was an [amendment](http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?gid=2014-07-07.166.1) to the original motion "That these bills be now read a [second time](http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/making-a-law.html)" and was the following: _At the end of the motion, add:_ _but the Senate notes_ _(a) the scientific and expert consensus regarding Climate Change;_ _(b) that in its first year, the Clean Energy Future Package:_ _(i) drove a 7% reduction in carbon pollution from electricity generation in the National Electricity Market;_ _(ii) saw renewable energy increase its share of the National Electricity Market by 25%;_ _(iii) delivered the household assistance package to compensate families and individuals for any impact of carbon pricing; and_ _(iv) supported continued economic growth, with over 160,000 jobs created in 2012-13 across the economy, including clean energy jobs;_ _(c) that since the 2013 election Australia's international reputation on climate change action has been damaged by becoming the first nation to move backwards on climate change while the rest of the world, including China and the US, is moving forward; and_ _(d) the need for the Government to pass an [Emissions Trading Scheme](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emissions_Trading_Scheme) to place a cap on carbon pollution and drive a clean energy future for Australia._ Background to the bills The [Clean Energy Legislation (Carbon Tax Repeal) Bill 2013 (No. 2)](http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r5292) and related bills were introduced to remove the [carbon pricing mechanism](http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.