Division
The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/28037/&sid=0000) introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which means it failed. ### Motion text > *That Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 and the Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Communications) Bill 2024 be referred to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Reform for consideration and an advisory report by 3 March 2025.*
House of Representatives, 2024-11-18. negative: ayes 14, noes 50.
Question
The majority voted against a [motion](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Hansard/Hansard_Display?bid=chamber/hansardr/28037/&sid=0000) introduced by Curtin MP [Kate Chaney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/curtin/kate_chaney) (Independent), which means it failed. ### Motion text > *That Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024 and the Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Communications) Bill 2024 be referred to the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Reform for consideration and an advisory report by 3 March 2025.*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
- Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Communications) Bill 2024
- Electoral Legislation Amendment (Electoral Reform) Bill 2024
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.