Division
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-03-26.30.1) introduced by Wannon MP [Dan Tehan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/wannon/dan_tehan) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 3, page 9 (after line 15), after section 199E, insert:* > >> *199EA Statement about each removal pathway direction* >> >> *Minister must prepare statement* >> >> *(1) The Minister must prepare a statement about each removal pathway non-citizen who is given a removal pathway direction.* >> >>> *Note: Statements about 2 or more removal pathway non-citizens could be included in the same document.* >>> >>> *Information included in the statement* >> >> *(2) The statement about the removal pathway non-citizen must include the following:* >> >>> *(a) the non-citizen's country of origin;* >>> >>> *(b) the class of visa (if any) held by the non-citizen at the time the removal pathway direction was given;* >>> >>> *(c) the number and classes of visas (if any) previously held by the non-citizen;* >>> >>> *(d) whether the non-citizen is a serious offender (within the meaning of Division 395 of the Criminal Code) and, if so, any offences for which the non-citizen has been convicted;* >>> >>> *(e) whether the non-citizen is, or has been, the subject of a community safety order (within the meaning of that Division) and, if so, the details of that order;* >>> >>> *(f) whether, in the absence of compliance with the removal pathway direction, there would be no real prospect of the removal of the non-citizen from Australia under section 198 becoming practicable in the reasonably foreseeable future.* >> >> *(3) The statement about the removal pathway non-citizen must not include:* >> >>> *(a) the non-citizen's name, date of birth or residential address; or* >>> >>> *(b) information that would otherwise reveal the non-citizen's identity; or* >>> >>> *(c) information the disclosure of which would, or coul
House of Representatives, 2024-03-26. negative: ayes 46, noes 84.
Question
The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2024-03-26.30.1) introduced by Wannon MP [Dan Tehan](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/wannon/dan_tehan) (Liberal), which means it failed. ### Amendment text > *(1) Schedule 1, item 3, page 9 (after line 15), after section 199E, insert:* > >> *199EA Statement about each removal pathway direction* >> >> *Minister must prepare statement* >> >> *(1) The Minister must prepare a statement about each removal pathway non-citizen who is given a removal pathway direction.* >> >>> *Note: Statements about 2 or more removal pathway non-citizens could be included in the same document.* >>> >>> *Information included in the statement* >> >> *(2) The statement about the removal pathway non-citizen must include the following:* >> >>> *(a) the non-citizen's country of origin;* >>> >>> *(b) the class of visa (if any) held by the non-citizen at the time the removal pathway direction was given;* >>> >>> *(c) the number and classes of visas (if any) previously held by the non-citizen;* >>> >>> *(d) whether the non-citizen is a serious offender (within the meaning of Division 395 of the Criminal Code) and, if so, any offences for which the non-citizen has been convicted;* >>> >>> *(e) whether the non-citizen is, or has been, the subject of a community safety order (within the meaning of that Division) and, if so, the details of that order;* >>> >>> *(f) whether, in the absence of compliance with the removal pathway direction, there would be no real prospect of the removal of the non-citizen from Australia under section 198 becoming practicable in the reasonably foreseeable future.* >> >> *(3) The statement about the removal pathway non-citizen must not include:* >> >>> *(a) the non-citizen's name, date of birth or residential address; or* >>> >>> *(b) information that would otherwise reveal the non-citizen's identity; or* >>> >>> *(c) information the disclosure of which would, or coul
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.