Division
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-09-07.23.1) to [another amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2022-09-08/2) moved by Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Farrer MP [Sussan Ley](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/farrer/sussan_ley) (Liberal). Because this motion passed, the amendment to the amendment failed and the original motion will remain unchanged. This amendment to the amendment was introduced by Mayo MP [Rebekha Sharkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/mayo/rebekha_sharkie) (Centre Alliance), who [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-09-07.23.1) her amendment: > *calls on the government to take into account ... that smaller and regional residential aged-care providers which are experiencing critical workforce shortages have flexibility.* ### Amendment to the amendment text > *That all words after "whilst" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"the House:* > > *(1) has concerns that the bulk of the substantive measures comprising the bill are to be detailed in subordinate rather than in primary legislation; and* > > *(2) calls on the Government to* > >> *(a) provide an opportunity to review the Quality of Care Principles, User Rights Principles and Information Principles proposed to be made under the Aged Care Act 1997;* >> >> *(b) include in the Quality of Care Principles under Schedule 2 criteria for the exercise of exemption powers which provide for smaller and regional providers taking into account critical workforce shortages among other considerations; and* >> >> *(c) specify in Information Principles under Schedule 3 financial and non-financial information of value to older Australians, their families and the community that must be published by the Secretary, including:* >> >>> *(i) expenditure on care, nursing, food, maintenance, cleaning and administ
House of Representatives, 2022-09-08. affirmative: ayes 70, noes 66.
Question
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-09-07.23.1) to [another amendment](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/divisions/representatives/2022-09-08/2) moved by Deputy Leader of the Opposition and Farrer MP [Sussan Ley](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/farrer/sussan_ley) (Liberal). Because this motion passed, the amendment to the amendment failed and the original motion will remain unchanged. This amendment to the amendment was introduced by Mayo MP [Rebekha Sharkie](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/mayo/rebekha_sharkie) (Centre Alliance), who [explained that](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2022-09-07.23.1) her amendment: > *calls on the government to take into account ... that smaller and regional residential aged-care providers which are experiencing critical workforce shortages have flexibility.* ### Amendment to the amendment text > *That all words after "whilst" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"the House:* > > *(1) has concerns that the bulk of the substantive measures comprising the bill are to be detailed in subordinate rather than in primary legislation; and* > > *(2) calls on the Government to* > >> *(a) provide an opportunity to review the Quality of Care Principles, User Rights Principles and Information Principles proposed to be made under the Aged Care Act 1997;* >> >> *(b) include in the Quality of Care Principles under Schedule 2 criteria for the exercise of exemption powers which provide for smaller and regional providers taking into account critical workforce shortages among other considerations; and* >> >> *(c) specify in Information Principles under Schedule 3 financial and non-financial information of value to older Australians, their families and the community that must be published by the Secretary, including:* >> >>> *(i) expenditure on care, nursing, food, maintenance, cleaning and administ
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.