Division
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.145.3) to keep the text of the usual [second reading motion](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) unchanged. The original second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a second time*," which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote took place after the MP for Rankin [Jim Chalmers](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/rankin/jim_chalmers) proposed the following [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.138.1). ### Proposed motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes the Government has:* > > *(1) taken far longer than promised to implement the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission;* > > *(2) failed to establish a compensation scheme of last resort, as recommended by the Hayne Royal Commission; and* > > *(3) actively rejected the very first recommendation of the Hayne Royal Commission, by proposing to repeal the responsible lending obligations in the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 for the vast majority of credit contracts."*
House of Representatives, 2021-02-15. affirmative: ayes 66, noes 56.
Question
The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.145.3) to keep the text of the usual [second reading motion](https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/) unchanged. The original second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a second time*," which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote took place after the MP for Rankin [Jim Chalmers](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/rankin/jim_chalmers) proposed the following [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-15.138.1). ### Proposed motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes the Government has:* > > *(1) taken far longer than promised to implement the recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission;* > > *(2) failed to establish a compensation scheme of last resort, as recommended by the Hayne Royal Commission; and* > > *(3) actively rejected the very first recommendation of the Hayne Royal Commission, by proposing to repeal the responsible lending obligations in the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 for the vast majority of credit contracts."*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.