Division
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-04.41.1) introduced by Barton MP [Linda Burney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/barton/linda_burney) (Labor), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(2) Schedule 1, item 51, page 18 (after line 30), at the end of Part 8-2, add:* > >> *200 Increase in cap on redress payments* >> >> *(1) As soon as practicable after this section commences, the Minister must consider the action that needs to be taken to increase the $150,000 cap on redress payments to $200,000.* >> >> *(2) Within 90 days after this section commences, the Minister must prepare a report on:* >> >>> *(a) what the Minister has done, or plans to do, to have the cap increased as mentioned in subsection (1); or* >>> >>> *(b) if the Minister has not done, and does not plan to do, anything—the Minister's reasons for this.* >> >> *(3) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament on or before the first sitting day of that House after the end of those 90 days.* >> >> *(4) In this section:* >> >>> *action includes amending this Act, an instrument made under this Act, or any other law.* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 51, page 18 (after line 30), at the end of Part 8-2, add:* > >> *201 Ending indexing of relevant prior payments* >> >> *(1) As soon as practicable after this section commences, the Minister must consider the action that needs to be taken to end the indexing of relevant prior payments.* >> >> *(2) Within 90 days after this section commences, the Minister must prepare a report on:* >> >>> *(a) what the Minister has done, or plans to do, to have indexing ended as mentioned in subsection (1); or* >>> >>> *(b) if the Minister has not done, and does not plan to do, anything—the Minister's reasons for this.* >> >> *(3) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament on or before the firs
House of Representatives, 2021-02-04. affirmative: ayes 61, noes 54.
Question
The majority voted in favour of *disagreeing* with [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-04.41.1) introduced by Barton MP [Linda Burney](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/barton/linda_burney) (Labor), which means they failed. ### Amendment text > *(2) Schedule 1, item 51, page 18 (after line 30), at the end of Part 8-2, add:* > >> *200 Increase in cap on redress payments* >> >> *(1) As soon as practicable after this section commences, the Minister must consider the action that needs to be taken to increase the $150,000 cap on redress payments to $200,000.* >> >> *(2) Within 90 days after this section commences, the Minister must prepare a report on:* >> >>> *(a) what the Minister has done, or plans to do, to have the cap increased as mentioned in subsection (1); or* >>> >>> *(b) if the Minister has not done, and does not plan to do, anything—the Minister's reasons for this.* >> >> *(3) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament on or before the first sitting day of that House after the end of those 90 days.* >> >> *(4) In this section:* >> >>> *action includes amending this Act, an instrument made under this Act, or any other law.* > > *(3) Schedule 1, item 51, page 18 (after line 30), at the end of Part 8-2, add:* > >> *201 Ending indexing of relevant prior payments* >> >> *(1) As soon as practicable after this section commences, the Minister must consider the action that needs to be taken to end the indexing of relevant prior payments.* >> >> *(2) Within 90 days after this section commences, the Minister must prepare a report on:* >> >>> *(a) what the Minister has done, or plans to do, to have indexing ended as mentioned in subsection (1); or* >>> >>> *(b) if the Minister has not done, and does not plan to do, anything—the Minister's reasons for this.* >> >> *(3) The Minister must cause a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of the Parliament on or before the firs
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.