Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-02.119.5) to keep the usual second reading motion unchanged. The usual second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a second time,*" which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote was put after the MP for Franklin [Julie Collins](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/franklin/julie_collins) (Labor) proposed an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-02.114.1). ### Proposed amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes the Coalition Government's continued failure to prioritise agriculture legislation and its inaction to address the agriculture workforce shortage."*

House of Representatives, 2021-02-02. affirmative: ayes 66, noes 56.

Question

The majority voted in favour of a [motion](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-02.119.5) to keep the usual second reading motion unchanged. The usual second reading motion is "*that the bill be read a second time,*" which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. This vote was put after the MP for Franklin [Julie Collins](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/franklin/julie_collins) (Labor) proposed an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debate/?id=2021-02-02.114.1). ### Proposed amendment text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes the Coalition Government's continued failure to prioritise agriculture legislation and its inaction to address the agriculture workforce shortage."*

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.