Skip to content

Menu

Division

The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2020-02-24.25.2) to the usual [second reading motion](https://www.peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/), which means it failed. The usual second reading motion is "that the bill be read for a second time", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. The amendment was introduced by Sydney MP [Tanya Plibersek](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/sydney/tanya_plibersek) (Labor). ### Motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that the Government has damaged the quality of Australia's world-class education system by:* > > *(1) cutting billions from universities by effectively capping undergraduate places;* > > *(2) slashing research funding; and* > > *(3) failing to develop a long-term education policy for the nation".*

House of Representatives, 2020-02-24. negative: ayes 65, noes 76.

Question

The majority voted against an [amendment](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2020-02-24.25.2) to the usual [second reading motion](https://www.peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/bills-and-laws/making-a-law-in-the-australian-parliament/), which means it failed. The usual second reading motion is "that the bill be read for a second time", which is parliamentary jargon for agreeing with the main idea of the bill. The amendment was introduced by Sydney MP [Tanya Plibersek](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/sydney/tanya_plibersek) (Labor). ### Motion text > *That all words after "That" be omitted with a view to substituting the following words:* > > *"whilst not declining to give the bill a second reading, the House notes that the Government has damaged the quality of Australia's world-class education system by:* > > *(1) cutting billions from universities by effectively capping undergraduate places;* > > *(2) slashing research funding; and* > > *(3) failing to develop a long-term education policy for the nation".*

View original

How each member voted

Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.

Related bills

Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.