Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2020-02-11.92.1) introduced by Whitlam MP [Stephen Jones](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/whitlam/stephen_jones) (Labor), which means they failed. The amendments related to conflicted remuneration, which is defined as: > *… any benefit, whether monetary or non-monetary, given to a financial services licensee, or a representative of a financial services licensee, who provides financial product advice to persons as retail clients that, because of the nature of the benefit or the circumstances in which it is given:* > > *(a) could reasonably be expected to influence the choice of financial product …*
House of Representatives, 2020-02-11. negative: ayes 68, noes 75.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2020-02-11.92.1) introduced by Whitlam MP [Stephen Jones](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/whitlam/stephen_jones) (Labor), which means they failed. The amendments related to conflicted remuneration, which is defined as: > *… any benefit, whether monetary or non-monetary, given to a financial services licensee, or a representative of a financial services licensee, who provides financial product advice to persons as retail clients that, because of the nature of the benefit or the circumstances in which it is given:* > > *(a) could reasonably be expected to influence the choice of financial product …*
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.