Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2019-07-23.113.1) introduced by MP for Isaacs [Mark Dreyfus](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/isaacs/mark_dreyfus) (Labor), which means they failed. ### What were the amendments? MP Dreyfus [explained that the amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2019-07-23.113.1): > *ensure that the bill conforms to the unanimous and bipartisan recommendations of Labor and government members of the intelligence committee—no more, no less ... there are 10, or possibly 11, of the unanimous recommendations of the committee that have not been agreed to by the government.* MP Dreyfus then went through each of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security that the government didn't implement, and set out how the Labor Party has sought to give effect to the recommendations in the amendments. ### What do the bills do? According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1920a/20bd006): > *The [Counter-Terrorism (Temporary Exclusion Orders) Bill 2019](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r6361) (the TEO Bill) will introduce two new orders, each of which could be made by the Minister for Home Affairs:* > > * *a temporary exclusion order (TEO), which may prevent an Australian citizen aged 14 years or older who is overseas from returning to Australia for up to two years at a time and* > * *a return permit, under which the Minister may impose conditions on the person’s entry into Australia, including conditions with which the person must comply for up to 12 months after re-entering the country.* > > *The orders are intended to enable authorities to plan for and manage the return of Australians of counter-terrorism interest (such as individuals who have fought with or otherwise supported a terrorist organisation overseas) and miti
House of Representatives, 2019-07-23. negative: ayes 71, noes 77.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2019-07-23.113.1) introduced by MP for Isaacs [Mark Dreyfus](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/isaacs/mark_dreyfus) (Labor), which means they failed. ### What were the amendments? MP Dreyfus [explained that the amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2019-07-23.113.1): > *ensure that the bill conforms to the unanimous and bipartisan recommendations of Labor and government members of the intelligence committee—no more, no less ... there are 10, or possibly 11, of the unanimous recommendations of the committee that have not been agreed to by the government.* MP Dreyfus then went through each of the recommendations of the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security that the government didn't implement, and set out how the Labor Party has sought to give effect to the recommendations in the amendments. ### What do the bills do? According to the [bills digest](https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/bd/bd1920a/20bd006): > *The [Counter-Terrorism (Temporary Exclusion Orders) Bill 2019](https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:legislation/billhome/r6361) (the TEO Bill) will introduce two new orders, each of which could be made by the Minister for Home Affairs:* > > * *a temporary exclusion order (TEO), which may prevent an Australian citizen aged 14 years or older who is overseas from returning to Australia for up to two years at a time and* > * *a return permit, under which the Minister may impose conditions on the person’s entry into Australia, including conditions with which the person must comply for up to 12 months after re-entering the country.* > > *The orders are intended to enable authorities to plan for and manage the return of Australians of counter-terrorism interest (such as individuals who have fought with or otherwise supported a terrorist organisation overseas) and miti
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.