Division
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2017-10-17.93.1) introduced by Makin MP [Tony Zappia](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/makin/tony_zappia) (Labor), which means they failed. ### Amendment text On sheet 1: > *(1) Clause 103, page 88 (line 4), omit "for an end use solely in cosmetics", substitute "for an end use in cosmetics (whether or not that end use is the sole end use)".* > > *(2) Clause 103, page 88 (line 5), omit "may", substitute "must".* > > *(3) Clause 103, page 88 (line 10), after "2018", insert ", in relation to the end use of the industrial chemical in cosmetics,".* > > *(4) Clause 103, page 88 (after line 10), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *(3) Subsection (2) does not limit section 100.* > > *(5) Clause 168, page 137 (line 3), omit "for an end use solely in cosmetics", substitute "for an end use in cosmetics (whether or not that end use is the sole end use)".* > > *(6) Clause 168, page 137 (line 5), omit "requirement in subsection (2)", substitute "requirements in subsections (2) and (3)".* > > *(7) Clause 168, page 137 (lines 6 to 9), omit subclause (2), substitute:* > >> *(2) If:* >> >>> *(a) the industrial chemical is to be introduced for an end use in cosmetics and one or more other end uses not in cosmetics; and* >>> >>> *(b) a single application under this Act relating to the introduction for each of those uses would include animal test data obtained from tests conducted on or after 1 July 2018;* >>> >>>> *it is a requirement that separate applications must be made in respect of:* >>> >>> *(c) the introduction of the chemical for the end use in cosmetics; and* >>> >>> *(d) the introduction of the chemical for the end uses not in cosmetics.* >> >> *(3) It is a requirement that an application for the introduction of an industrial chemical for an end use in cosmetics must not include animal test data obtained from tests conducted on or after 1 July 2018 in circumstances pres
House of Representatives, 2017-10-17. negative: ayes 70, noes 74.
Question
The majority voted against [amendments](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/debates/?id=2017-10-17.93.1) introduced by Makin MP [Tony Zappia](https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/people/representatives/makin/tony_zappia) (Labor), which means they failed. ### Amendment text On sheet 1: > *(1) Clause 103, page 88 (line 4), omit "for an end use solely in cosmetics", substitute "for an end use in cosmetics (whether or not that end use is the sole end use)".* > > *(2) Clause 103, page 88 (line 5), omit "may", substitute "must".* > > *(3) Clause 103, page 88 (line 10), after "2018", insert ", in relation to the end use of the industrial chemical in cosmetics,".* > > *(4) Clause 103, page 88 (after line 10), at the end of the clause, add:* > >> *(3) Subsection (2) does not limit section 100.* > > *(5) Clause 168, page 137 (line 3), omit "for an end use solely in cosmetics", substitute "for an end use in cosmetics (whether or not that end use is the sole end use)".* > > *(6) Clause 168, page 137 (line 5), omit "requirement in subsection (2)", substitute "requirements in subsections (2) and (3)".* > > *(7) Clause 168, page 137 (lines 6 to 9), omit subclause (2), substitute:* > >> *(2) If:* >> >>> *(a) the industrial chemical is to be introduced for an end use in cosmetics and one or more other end uses not in cosmetics; and* >>> >>> *(b) a single application under this Act relating to the introduction for each of those uses would include animal test data obtained from tests conducted on or after 1 July 2018;* >>> >>>> *it is a requirement that separate applications must be made in respect of:* >>> >>> *(c) the introduction of the chemical for the end use in cosmetics; and* >>> >>> *(d) the introduction of the chemical for the end uses not in cosmetics.* >> >> *(3) It is a requirement that an application for the introduction of an industrial chemical for an end use in cosmetics must not include animal test data obtained from tests conducted on or after 1 July 2018 in circumstances pres
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.