Division
Scott Morrison I am pleased to summarise and conclude this debate. I first of all want to thank members who have contributed to this debate. The measures that are included in this set of bills make important changes to superannuation, to make it fairer and more sustainable from a fiscal point of view, but also to ensure that our—I think—world-leading superannuation scheme continues to be that. It ensures that Australians are able to save over the course of their working lives in a much more flexible and fair way to ensure that they can provide for their retirement. There are three great economic goals that I think Australians share: to be able to own your own home; to be able to raise your children—where you have been given that great blessing—and to be able to provide for your children and support you children by obtaining work and becoming self-sufficient as a family; and, thirdly, to be able to be independent in your retirement years. These are important economic objectives and goals that I think Australians share and aspire to. As a government, we want to facilitate and support all of those goals. These bills do exactly that, by making the superannuation system fairer, more flexible and, of course, more sustainable. This is to reflect also the more precisely defined objective of superannuation; it is not there to provide a tax minimisation vehicle and it is not there to provide an estate planning tool. It is there to ensure that people can save and provide for an income in retirement where they can support themselves, and that is what these bills achieve. I note the second reading amendment that has been brought forward by the opposition. I make a couple of comments in relation to that second reading amendment. Firstly, it makes reference to the budget being under threat and hitting the pay packets of Australians and risking our triple-A credit rating. The greatest threat to our triple-A credit rating sits on the opposition benches. When the Labor Party faces up
House of Representatives, 2016-11-22. negative: ayes 69, noes 79.
Question
Scott Morrison I am pleased to summarise and conclude this debate. I first of all want to thank members who have contributed to this debate. The measures that are included in this set of bills make important changes to superannuation, to make it fairer and more sustainable from a fiscal point of view, but also to ensure that our—I think—world-leading superannuation scheme continues to be that. It ensures that Australians are able to save over the course of their working lives in a much more flexible and fair way to ensure that they can provide for their retirement. There are three great economic goals that I think Australians share: to be able to own your own home; to be able to raise your children—where you have been given that great blessing—and to be able to provide for your children and support you children by obtaining work and becoming self-sufficient as a family; and, thirdly, to be able to be independent in your retirement years. These are important economic objectives and goals that I think Australians share and aspire to. As a government, we want to facilitate and support all of those goals. These bills do exactly that, by making the superannuation system fairer, more flexible and, of course, more sustainable. This is to reflect also the more precisely defined objective of superannuation; it is not there to provide a tax minimisation vehicle and it is not there to provide an estate planning tool. It is there to ensure that people can save and provide for an income in retirement where they can support themselves, and that is what these bills achieve. I note the second reading amendment that has been brought forward by the opposition. I make a couple of comments in relation to that second reading amendment. Firstly, it makes reference to the budget being under threat and hitting the pay packets of Australians and risking our triple-A credit rating. The greatest threat to our triple-A credit rating sits on the opposition benches. When the Labor Party faces up
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.