Division
Zali Steggall I move amendments (1) to (11), as circulated in my name, together: (1) Clause 2, page 4 (table item 21), omit the table item. (2) Schedule 1, item 1, page 5 (line 4) to page 7 (line 26), omit the item. (3) Schedule 1, item 6, page 8 (lines 17 to 20), omit paragraph 66AAB(a). (4) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (line 1), omit "6 months", substitute "12 months". (5) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (line 3), omit "6 months", substitute "12 months". (6) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (lines 23 to 25), omit the note. (7) Schedule 1, item 6, page 10 (lines 30 to 33), omit paragraph 66AAC(4)(a). (8) Schedule 1, item 6, page 11 (line 7), at the end of subsection 66AAC(4) (before the note), add: ; (d) it is probable that the employee's position will cease to exist in the period of 12 months after the day the notification is given; (e) it is probable that there will be a significant change in the employee's hours, or patterns, of work in the period of 12 months after the day the notification is given. (9) Schedule 1, item 18, page 18 (lines 6 to 11), omit paragraph 125A(2)(aa). (10) Schedule 1, item 308, page 216 (lines 9 to 17), omit paragraph 92(2)(a), substitute: (a) to resolve an uncertainty or difficulty relating to the interaction between the instrument and the provisions of Division 4A of Part 2-2 of the amended Act; or (11) Schedule 1, item 308, page 216 (line 27) to page 217 (line 20), omit subclauses 93(1) to (4). These amendments are important, because, after extensive consultation with businesses in Warringah and broader organisations such as COSBOA and the Business Council, briefings with the unions and liaising with small businesses and local chambers of commerce, I know there is an incredibly high level of concern at the overreach of this legislation. No-one has disputed, throughout the course of this debate around all the amendments, that some of the intent is genuine. But, in relation to much of these amendments, I feel that it's a sledgehammer being taken to
House of Representatives, 2023-11-29. negative: ayes 6, noes 55.
Question
Zali Steggall I move amendments (1) to (11), as circulated in my name, together: (1) Clause 2, page 4 (table item 21), omit the table item. (2) Schedule 1, item 1, page 5 (line 4) to page 7 (line 26), omit the item. (3) Schedule 1, item 6, page 8 (lines 17 to 20), omit paragraph 66AAB(a). (4) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (line 1), omit "6 months", substitute "12 months". (5) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (line 3), omit "6 months", substitute "12 months". (6) Schedule 1, item 6, page 9 (lines 23 to 25), omit the note. (7) Schedule 1, item 6, page 10 (lines 30 to 33), omit paragraph 66AAC(4)(a). (8) Schedule 1, item 6, page 11 (line 7), at the end of subsection 66AAC(4) (before the note), add: ; (d) it is probable that the employee's position will cease to exist in the period of 12 months after the day the notification is given; (e) it is probable that there will be a significant change in the employee's hours, or patterns, of work in the period of 12 months after the day the notification is given. (9) Schedule 1, item 18, page 18 (lines 6 to 11), omit paragraph 125A(2)(aa). (10) Schedule 1, item 308, page 216 (lines 9 to 17), omit paragraph 92(2)(a), substitute: (a) to resolve an uncertainty or difficulty relating to the interaction between the instrument and the provisions of Division 4A of Part 2-2 of the amended Act; or (11) Schedule 1, item 308, page 216 (line 27) to page 217 (line 20), omit subclauses 93(1) to (4). These amendments are important, because, after extensive consultation with businesses in Warringah and broader organisations such as COSBOA and the Business Council, briefings with the unions and liaising with small businesses and local chambers of commerce, I know there is an incredibly high level of concern at the overreach of this legislation. No-one has disputed, throughout the course of this debate around all the amendments, that some of the intent is genuine. But, in relation to much of these amendments, I feel that it's a sledgehammer being taken to
How each member voted
Per-member votes are not present in this static export. Consult the original division record.
Related bills
Only formal divisions leave a per-member record. A procedural vote is not necessarily a vote for or against a bill.